2021
DOI: 10.1080/2374068x.2021.1945272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mechanical behaviour of graphene oxide grafted CFRP composites: a comparison of anodic and cathodic EPD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treated CFs were subjected to XPS (Figure 16) and deconvolution of C1 peaks was performed to understand the changes in the surface chemistry brought about by plasma treatment. They have observed that the peak area ratios of C=O and COOR have increased, and also a decrease of C-O peak area was Carbon fiber (T300)/epoxy/ GO Anodic EPD Fiber surface ILSS:,FS: [172] Carbon fiber (T300)/epoxy/ GO Cathodic EPD Fiber surface ILSS:,FS: [172] Note: "+" indicates increment and "-" indicates decrement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treated CFs were subjected to XPS (Figure 16) and deconvolution of C1 peaks was performed to understand the changes in the surface chemistry brought about by plasma treatment. They have observed that the peak area ratios of C=O and COOR have increased, and also a decrease of C-O peak area was Carbon fiber (T300)/epoxy/ GO Anodic EPD Fiber surface ILSS:,FS: [172] Carbon fiber (T300)/epoxy/ GO Cathodic EPD Fiber surface ILSS:,FS: [172] Note: "+" indicates increment and "-" indicates decrement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%