2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-020-03206-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of mechanical, optical and thermal properties of PVA nanocomposites embedded with Fe2O3 nanofillers and the investigation of their thermal decomposition characteristics under non-isothermal heating condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal decomposition temperatures ( T d ) of PVA, PNIPAM, and PVA–PNIPAM were 372.1, 335.7, and 407.2 °C, respectively (Figure S5). The weight loss of the hydrogels can be divided into three stages: (I) evaporation of water on the hydrogel surface as well as loss of internal FW and weakly BW; (II) the loss of BW due to strong hydrogen bonding; and (III) decomposition of hydrogel polymer backbone. , The weight loss of each hydrogel (Table S2) indicates that CPV in stage II is 31.54%, much higher than that of CPN (10.82%) and CPVPN (0.12%). This may be caused by numerous hydroxyl groups in CPV form strong hydrogen bonds with BW, which contains higher desorption enthalpy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal decomposition temperatures ( T d ) of PVA, PNIPAM, and PVA–PNIPAM were 372.1, 335.7, and 407.2 °C, respectively (Figure S5). The weight loss of the hydrogels can be divided into three stages: (I) evaporation of water on the hydrogel surface as well as loss of internal FW and weakly BW; (II) the loss of BW due to strong hydrogen bonding; and (III) decomposition of hydrogel polymer backbone. , The weight loss of each hydrogel (Table S2) indicates that CPV in stage II is 31.54%, much higher than that of CPN (10.82%) and CPVPN (0.12%). This may be caused by numerous hydroxyl groups in CPV form strong hydrogen bonds with BW, which contains higher desorption enthalpy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selvi et al [ 48 ] fabricated 6% ZnO/PVA nanocomposite thin film and found the electrical conductivity of 1.48 × 10 −8 S/cm. Further 6% Fe 2 O 3 was added in PVA and fabricated the thin film and found the electrical conductivity as 2.4 × 10 −8 S/cm [ 49 ]. When compared with existing literature, GCN-doped PVA has higher conductivity due to the presence of more conjugated bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selvi et al [48] fabricated 6%ZnO/PVA nanocomposite thin film and found the electrical conductivity of 1.48x10 -8 S/cm. Further 6% Fe2O3 was added in PVA and fabricated the thin film and found the electrical conductivity as 2.4x10 -8 S/cm [49].…”
Section: Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of agglomerates in different nanocomposites has been observed by the researchers. [9,39,58,59].…”
Section: Fesem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%