Evaluation of Methods for Classifying Epidemiological Data on Choropleth Maps in Series

Abstract

Our research goal was to determine which choropleth classification methods are most suitable for epidemiological rate maps. We compared seven methods using responses by fifty-six subjects in a two-part experiment involving nine series of U.S. mortality maps. Subjects answered a wide range of general map-reading questions that involved individual maps and comparisons among maps in a series. The questions addressed varied scales of map-reading, from individual enumeration units, to regions, to whole-map distributions. Quantiles and minimum boundary error classification methods were best suited for these general choropleth map-reading tasks. Natural breaks (Jenks) and a hybrid version of equal-intervals classing formed a second grouping in the results, both producing responses less than 70 percent as accurate as for quantiles. Using matched legends across a series of maps (when possible) increased map-comparison accuracy by approximately 28 percent. The advantages of careful optimization procedures in choropleth classification seem to offer no benefit over the simpler quantile method for the general map-reading tasks tested in the reported experiment.

Using Geographical Convergence of Obesity, Cardiovascular Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes at the Neighborhood Level to Inform Policy and Practice

“…The regional variation was mapped across western Adelaide communities for continuous values of BMI, CVD, and type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Values were categorized into 4 groups using the Jenks natural breaks classification method (separation of data based on naturally occurring groups, determined to be the best arrangement of data) (15). A similar technique was used to map the geospatial variation of SES in western Adelaide, although SA1 regions were instead categorized into 3 groups based on the ABS SEIFA tertiles.…”

Making the most of spatial information in health: a tutorial in Bayesian disease mapping for areal data

“…Options include maps or graphs of the smoothed estimates, their associated uncertainty, or the probabilities of being above/below certain values. Mapping of disease rates or outcomes facilitates comparison of spatial patterns in disease rates between males and females, between age groups, between races, over time, and motivates comparison with patterns of potential causes (Brewer and Pickle, 2002). By comparing disease rates of different areas, clues to possible causation may be found and this serves as a starting point for further investigation.…”

Mapping the climate: guidance on appropriate techniques to map climate variables and their uncertainty

“…As well as map projections, the selection of class intervals can strongly affect the visual impression given by a map (Evans, 1977), and there are complexities in assigning classes to data (Brewer and Pickle, 2002). For example selecting the value for the maximum and minimum class boundary can impact how the map is perceived.…”

“…For example selecting the value for the maximum and minimum class boundary can impact how the map is perceived. However, from the wide literature on the subject of data classification it is clear there is no consensus on the best way to classify data (Brewer and Pickle, 2002), and it varies from map to map. For this reason, the data classification presented in this paper is done manually and in a way that attempts to avoid misrepresentation of the underlying data.…”