2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of microbial diversity of different soil layers at a contaminated diesel site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maila et al (2005) demonstrated that the type and concentration of pollutants, rather than the geographical origin of the soil, may be more important in determining the functional diversity and species diversity of such bacterial communities. Because individual bacterial monocultures can metabolise a limited range of hydrocarbon substrates (Britton 1984), a mixed bacterial consortium with broad enzymatic capacities may be more efficient for remediation, and the advantages of using mixed cultures instead of pure cultures in biodegradation processes, such as higher tolerance to temperature, pH and salinity, and higher capacity of produce biosurfactants or extracellular surface-active products, have been amply demonstrated (Boopathy 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maila et al (2005) demonstrated that the type and concentration of pollutants, rather than the geographical origin of the soil, may be more important in determining the functional diversity and species diversity of such bacterial communities. Because individual bacterial monocultures can metabolise a limited range of hydrocarbon substrates (Britton 1984), a mixed bacterial consortium with broad enzymatic capacities may be more efficient for remediation, and the advantages of using mixed cultures instead of pure cultures in biodegradation processes, such as higher tolerance to temperature, pH and salinity, and higher capacity of produce biosurfactants or extracellular surface-active products, have been amply demonstrated (Boopathy 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because PH contaminants can penetrate deeper than the topsoil layer, it is important to understand how contaminants affect microbial communities along the soil-depth and how microbial activity contributes to biodegradation of penetrating PHs. [10] In addition, the intrinsic biodegradation pathway of PHs should be understood first through monitoring of residual PHs and soil bacterial community for predicting its remedial stage because biodegradation is a site-specific process. [11,12] Studies of microbial community dynamics in PHscontaminated soil layers have been conducted: TPH content and biological activities for TPH degradation were higher in topsoil layer microcosms than in 1-m depth soil layer microcosms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este comportamiento, puede reflejar dependencia de algunas poblaciones a la disponibilidad de fuentes de carbono, derivadas de la biotransformación de la mezcla de hidrocarburos, llevada a cabo por poblaciones microbianas más versátiles (bandas comunes). Cambios en la composición de las comunidades microbianas y selección de poblaciones durante la biodegradación se han reportado previamente utilizando análisis comparativo de los perfiles genó-micos e intensidad de bandas a través del tiempo, en presencia de hidrocarburos y en diferentes tipos de tratamiento en suelo (Maila et al 2005, Supaphol et al 2006. Para el suelo IAN en el periodo analizado (28 a 56 días), la riqueza estimada (S Chao2 ) para ambos tratamientos intemperizados (Fig.…”
Section: Dinámica De La Comunidad Microbiana Nativa En El Ensayo De Bunclassified