1995
DOI: 10.1557/proc-412-469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Microbially-Influenced Degradation of Massive Concrete Structures

Abstract: Corrosion of massive concrete structures is a costly and environmentally dangerous problem. Many low level waste disposal vaults, both above and below ground, are constructed of concrete. When the integrity of these structures is compromised, potential for soil and water contamination is significantly increased. There are literally thousands of massive concrete structures within the U.S. infrastructure that are in a serious state of disrepair due to corrosion. One potential contributing agent to the destructio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will focus more on the types of microbial physiologies and effects, with less attention to species names, since it is important to pay more attention to environmental niches than any particular species for several reasons. Due to species richness in the environment and our dearth of information regarding microbial species in the environment, it is likely that significant species variability will exist from place to place even though the same biogeochemical processes are occurring [5,13]. Our findings are meant as a guide for use by environmental modelers for determination of, and prediction of, the stability of concrete structures in various environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will focus more on the types of microbial physiologies and effects, with less attention to species names, since it is important to pay more attention to environmental niches than any particular species for several reasons. Due to species richness in the environment and our dearth of information regarding microbial species in the environment, it is likely that significant species variability will exist from place to place even though the same biogeochemical processes are occurring [5,13]. Our findings are meant as a guide for use by environmental modelers for determination of, and prediction of, the stability of concrete structures in various environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, biodegradation of concrete structures was demonstrated to be a common occurrence; however, various microbial populations and mechanisms were shown to play different roles at different locations [5][6][7]. As a result, microbial assays designed to determine the rate of concrete biodegradation proved useful in evaluating concrete properties but were not a good predictor of environmental impacts on concrete [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of biocorrosion, the porosity of concrete increases [6,12,13] and diffusion processes accelerate, which contributes to the development of corrosion processes [14][15][16][17]. The reaction of biogenic acids and other products of the vital activity of microorganisms with the components of the cement stone of concrete leads to the destruction of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature review focuses on the biodegradation of concrete, paying particular attention to the 84 various physiological aspects of microorganisms that control concrete biodegradation and also the 85 physical and chemical parameters that control microbial activity. Due to species richness in the 86 environment and our dearth of information regarding microbial species in the environment, it is 87 likely that significant species variability will exist from place to place even though the same 88 biogeochemical processes are occurring (Hamilton et al, 1996;Silva, 1996) hence, the focus is 89 more on the types of microbial physiologies and effects, with less attention to species names. 90…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%