2019
DOI: 10.1002/adbi.201900162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Microfluidic Ceiling Designs for the Capture of Circulating Tumor Cells on a Microarray Platform

Abstract: The capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is still a challenging application for microfluidic chips, as these cells are rare and hidden in a huge background of blood cells. Here, different microfluidic ceiling designs in regard to their capture efficiency for CTCs in model experiments and more realistic conditions of blood samples spiked with a clinically relevant amount of tumor cells are evaluated. An optimized design for the capture platform that allows highly efficient recovery of CTCs from size‐based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting arrays show good specificity for macrophage capture based on specific antibody interaction and offer additional control for false positives (in the form of unspecifically adhering cells) by checking co-location of array features with adhering macrophages. Such arrays could be upscaled for high-throughput production by additional printing methods as μCS with parallel tips [64] or PPL [56,65] with adjusted custom stamps of appropriate feature size, and be incorporated into microfluidics for future application in biomedical experiments and clinical diagnostics. [65][66][67] Overall, the approach opens up the route for easy and efficient macrophage capture and future sorting applications in research and medical practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting arrays show good specificity for macrophage capture based on specific antibody interaction and offer additional control for false positives (in the form of unspecifically adhering cells) by checking co-location of array features with adhering macrophages. Such arrays could be upscaled for high-throughput production by additional printing methods as μCS with parallel tips [64] or PPL [56,65] with adjusted custom stamps of appropriate feature size, and be incorporated into microfluidics for future application in biomedical experiments and clinical diagnostics. [65][66][67] Overall, the approach opens up the route for easy and efficient macrophage capture and future sorting applications in research and medical practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such arrays could be upscaled for high‐throughput production by additional printing methods as μCS with parallel tips [ 64 ] or PPL [ 56,65 ] with adjusted custom stamps of appropriate feature size, and be incorporated into microfluidics for future application in biomedical experiments and clinical diagnostics. [ 65–67 ] Overall, the approach opens up the route for easy and efficient macrophage capture and future sorting applications in research and medical practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Although the microfluidic approach requires special reagents, 24 this approach enabled genomic analysis of captured cells. 29,30 Current CTC-based separation is usually based on a single 5–7.5 mL blood volume collection. For patients with low CTC content, separation techniques using a single blood collection cannot obtain a sufficient number of CTCs for subsequent molecular biological analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, Liu et al [93] utilized PPL to print reactive binding sites for detecting CTCs. By exploring the impact of staggered herringbone structure of microfluidic biochip and target cell concentration on the capture efficiency of CTC capture, they got an optimized protocol of CTC capture platform.…”
Section: Capture Of Ctcmentioning
confidence: 99%