2004
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200304572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of microstructures of variously heat treated carbon steel by magnetic coercivity measurement

Abstract: The microstructures of variously heat treated 0.85% carbon steel were evaluated by magnetic coercivity measurement. Austenitizing, isothermal transformation, continuous cooling or spheroidization heat treatment was carried out to produce various microstructures. Microstructural parameters such as prior austenite grain size, phase and pearlite interlamellar spacing were measured along with coercivity to investigate the relationships between them. Prior austenite grain size had little effect on the measured coer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8b is a mixture of ferrite and cementite essentially. However, due to large number of grain boundaries and dispersion of carbides, the movement of magnetic domain wall is still restricted, higher magnetic elds are required to overcome strong pinning sites and move domain walls [22][23], the coercivity level of 2# cylinder is still higher compared to that of the original cylinder. Moreover, the coercivity values determined using digital measurements were compared with the results obtained by the traditional HL method [24,34], a very good correlation was found between the two techniques (Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b is a mixture of ferrite and cementite essentially. However, due to large number of grain boundaries and dispersion of carbides, the movement of magnetic domain wall is still restricted, higher magnetic elds are required to overcome strong pinning sites and move domain walls [22][23], the coercivity level of 2# cylinder is still higher compared to that of the original cylinder. Moreover, the coercivity values determined using digital measurements were compared with the results obtained by the traditional HL method [24,34], a very good correlation was found between the two techniques (Fig.…”
Section: Microstructure and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grain boundaries act as pinning centers for dw pinning [ 30–32 ] and therefore result in larger coercivities. [ 33–37 ] Dislocations and residual stresses in the material due to deformation also lead to an increase in coercivity. [ 38–40 ] Residual stress results in preferred directions of magnetization and therefore in magnetoelastic anisotropy.…”
Section: Ferritic Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%