1991
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1991)011<0585:eomsla>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Minimum-Size Limits and Reduced Daily Limits on the Crappie Populations and Fisheries in Five Large Missouri Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of catch-and-release mortality studies concluded that most mortality occurs within 24 h, but a more complete estimate of the mortality should include delayed mortality (i.e., that occurring beyond the first 24 h postrelease; Muoneke and Childress 1994). Typically, a 3-d observation period is used (e.g., see Matlock et al 1993;Malchoff and Heins 1997), and only a few catch-and-release mortality studies use a longer postrelease observation period (e.g., blue cod Parapercis colias were observed for 14 d : Carbines 1999; largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides for 14-21 d: Schramm et al 1987; spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus for 30 d: Stunz and McKee 2006; white seabass Atractoscion nobilis for 90 d: Aalbers et al 2004; and white crappies Pomoxis annularis for 18 months: Colvin 1991). Observations beyond 3 d are difficult because fish must be confined artificially either in the laboratory or in the field, and such confinement may contribute to further stress and mortality.…”
Section: Recent Data From the Marine Recreational Fisherymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of catch-and-release mortality studies concluded that most mortality occurs within 24 h, but a more complete estimate of the mortality should include delayed mortality (i.e., that occurring beyond the first 24 h postrelease; Muoneke and Childress 1994). Typically, a 3-d observation period is used (e.g., see Matlock et al 1993;Malchoff and Heins 1997), and only a few catch-and-release mortality studies use a longer postrelease observation period (e.g., blue cod Parapercis colias were observed for 14 d : Carbines 1999; largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides for 14-21 d: Schramm et al 1987; spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus for 30 d: Stunz and McKee 2006; white seabass Atractoscion nobilis for 90 d: Aalbers et al 2004; and white crappies Pomoxis annularis for 18 months: Colvin 1991). Observations beyond 3 d are difficult because fish must be confined artificially either in the laboratory or in the field, and such confinement may contribute to further stress and mortality.…”
Section: Recent Data From the Marine Recreational Fisherymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the current 12 cm minimum size limit would allow giant clams to reproduce several times before being fished, as sexual maturity (male and female) is assumed to occur at 11 cm [25]. The efficiency of such method has been described widely [74], [75], [76], [77]. It was used for scallops [78] for example and Yau [38] in Moorea island (French Polynesia) used a non-spatial model to show that a size-limit of 13.5 cm for giant clams could locally ensure the best compromises between catches and abundance, independently of recruitment rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a manager might begin by restricting fish harvest. Restrictive regulations (e.g., reduced bag limits and increased minimum-length limits) may reduce total harvest (Colvin, 1991) and fishing pressure. Note, however, that even the most restrictive harvest regulations (i.e., catch-andrelease angling only) will not allow fish populations to support an ever-increasing amount of fishing pressure because of hooking mortality (Muoneke and Childress, 1994).…”
Section: Management Of Anglers Within a Regional Fisherymentioning
confidence: 99%