I n this paper, computation fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are employed to describe the effect of flow parameters on the formation of soot and NO x in a heavy duty engine under low load and high load. The complexity of diesel combustion, specially when soot, NO x and other emissions are of interest, requires using a detailed chemical mechanism to have a correct estimation of temperature and species distribution. In this work, Multiple Representative Interactive Flamelets (MRIF) method is employed to describe the chemical reactions, ignition, flame propagation and emissions in the engine. A phenomenological model for soot formation, including soot nucleation, coagulation and oxidation with O2 and OH is incorporated into the flamelet combustion model. Different strategies for modelling NO x are chosen to take into account the longer time scale for NO x formation. The numerical results are compared with experimental data to show the validity of the model for the cases under study. A good agreement is achieved between the model results and the pressure and heat release rate from the experiment. For soot and NO x , the model is able to correctly predict the trends between different cases. The effect of number of RIFs on the behaviour of the model is discussed. Downloaded from SAE International by Politecnico di Milano, Thursday, April 11, 2019 © SAE InternationalFIGURE 7 g/kWh of soot at the exhaust of the engine. Comparison between the model and the experiment.FIGURE 9 (a) Scatter plot of scalar dissipation rate in T-Z coordinate for HL1 cases, comparison between 1 and 12 RIFs, (b) Number of cells in the CFD domain for each T-Z point © SAE InternationalFIGURE 10 Soot volume fraction, soot formation and soot oxidation at 3 different time instances. © SAE International Downloaded from SAE International by Politecnico di Milano, Thursday, April 11, 2019 FIGURE 13 g/kWh of NO x at the exhaust of the engine. Comparison between the model and the experiment. © SAE International FIGURE 14 Mass fraction of NO vs temperature at 363 CAD for HL2 case; Behaviour of different modelling strategies on the NO formation.All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE International.Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of SAE International. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper.