2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of modelling approaches in predicting forest volume and stand age for small-scale plantation forests in New Zealand with RapidEye and LiDAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best model from Sentinel-2 alone explained 63% of the variability in the data with RMSEr of 42.03 %. These values are comparable to other recent studies that predict GSV using Sentinel imagery [13,15,64] and RapidEye imagery in similar forested landscapes [65]. Post-stratification of the data into species showed that the best models have lower RMSEr values for Pinus patula compared with other tree species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The best model from Sentinel-2 alone explained 63% of the variability in the data with RMSEr of 42.03 %. These values are comparable to other recent studies that predict GSV using Sentinel imagery [13,15,64] and RapidEye imagery in similar forested landscapes [65]. Post-stratification of the data into species showed that the best models have lower RMSEr values for Pinus patula compared with other tree species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Amongst inventory attributes, ALS typically estimates tree height with the highest precision [11,16] and errors are comparable to those of field measurements in tall trees [42]. The accurate estimation of height from ALS is important from an inventory perspective as this attribute is most time consuming to measure and as a result, traditional methods often rely on some form of subsampling [43]. Height can be derived from ALS using an area-based approach (ABA), where predictions are averaged to the resolution of the plot [44,45] or at individual tree level using individual tree detection (ITD) approaches [38,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include biometrics such as tree height [8][9][10], stem diameter [11,12], canopy cover and gap fraction [13,14], leaf-area index [15,16], timber volume [17,18], biomass [19,20] and carbon content [21,22]. Consequently, researchers and forest managers have increasingly used ALS measurements for the indirect retrieval of forest biometrics that are impractical to quantify directly through conventional forest mensuration techniques [23][24][25][26][27]. Forest inventory measurements derived from ALS data are often extrapolated to regional or national scales using covariates obtained from optical or radar satellite observations [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%