2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18720-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Morphological Hierarchies for Supervised Segmentation

Abstract: Abstract.We propose a quantitative evaluation of morphological hierarchies (quasi-flat zones, constraint connectivity, watersheds, observation scale) in a novel framework based on the marked segmentation problem. We created a set of automatically generated markers for the one object image datasets of Grabcut and Weizmann. In order to evaluate the hierarchies, we applied the same segmentation strategy by combining several parameters and markers. Our results, which shows important differences among the considere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should note that such segmentations are not hierarchical, and as such, we can not truly assess the bene t of a hierarchical organisation. A considerable amount of work is nowadays devoted to the construction of a sound evaluation framework [1,[29][30][31]. Although the question of the evaluation of hierarchies is an even more complex question, we are deeply convinced that the computer-vision community at large would bene t if hierarchical ground truths were available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should note that such segmentations are not hierarchical, and as such, we can not truly assess the bene t of a hierarchical organisation. A considerable amount of work is nowadays devoted to the construction of a sound evaluation framework [1,[29][30][31]. Although the question of the evaluation of hierarchies is an even more complex question, we are deeply convinced that the computer-vision community at large would bene t if hierarchical ground truths were available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method makes use of the Kruskal algorithm for propagating tags between sets hierarchically, since a minimum spanning tree establishes a hierarchical partition of a set [10].…”
Section: Hierarchical Strategy (Mst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have a more complete evaluation, we have performed a comparison with a state-of-the-art method [14], called Multiscale Combinatorial Grouping (MCG), and an well-know technique [1], named Ultrametric Contour Map (UCM), including different assessment measures: Precision-Recall (PR) for boundaries [1] and the Marked Segmentation [13] ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%