2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12239-012-0070-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of natural and tracer fluorescent emission methods for droplet size measurements in a diesel spray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed phase results shown in Figures 4 and 5 exhibit much stronger signal on one side of the spray, right and left respectively (note that the images are mirrored due to opposite locations of the cameras). This signal enhancement is not the effect of laser signal extinction as observed in single nozzle sprays [12,17,19] but results from the fact that the spray cloud observed here is formed by three jets. The light sheet crosses one jet emerging from the injector (right side of the LIF image, and left side of Mie image) while going between two other jets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The observed phase results shown in Figures 4 and 5 exhibit much stronger signal on one side of the spray, right and left respectively (note that the images are mirrored due to opposite locations of the cameras). This signal enhancement is not the effect of laser signal extinction as observed in single nozzle sprays [12,17,19] but results from the fact that the spray cloud observed here is formed by three jets. The light sheet crosses one jet emerging from the injector (right side of the LIF image, and left side of Mie image) while going between two other jets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It is also possible to use a single camera to record the fluorescence and elasticlight-scattering images in sequence [27,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. This approach provides reliable SMD measurements where there is reasonable confidence that the flow or spray characteristics do not change with time, steady spray [43,44].…”
Section: Sequential Imaging Of Plif and Mie Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach provides reliable SMD measurements where there is reasonable confidence that the flow or spray characteristics do not change with time, steady spray [43,44]. This approach is used in the literature, and it is observed that results are consistent with SMD measurements from Phase Doppler Interferometry (PDI) [43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Sequential Imaging Of Plif and Mie Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the obtained imaging diesel spray form and distribution of droplets in the gas phase were determined. Pastor et al (2012) used this method to determine the SMD, but to enhance the fluorescence effect, indicator Rhodamine B was added to the fuel. The method is widely used by other researchers - Li et al (2011) investigated the characteristics of the swirl spray.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%