2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13567-016-0405-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of natural porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) subclinical infection and seroconversion dynamics in piglets vaccinated at different ages

Abstract: This study aimed to determine the porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) serological and virological dynamics in piglets vaccinated at different ages in a PCV2 subclinical infection (PCV2-SI) scenario. Six hundred and forty-four 2 week-old healthy piglets were selected and distributed into four treatment groups: vaccination at 3, 6 or 10 weeks of age (3W-VAC, 6W-VAC and 10W-VAC groups, respectively) and unvaccinated pigs (NON-VAC group). Blood (n = 112 pigs) and oral fluid (OF) (n = 40 pens) samples were taken throu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
29
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was performed on serum, feces, and oral fluid samples from 22 farms where PCV2 vaccination programs are in place and from 4 farms that do not vaccinate. In general, our findings support earlier observations that vaccination against PCV2 can significantly limit viremia and viral shedding in feces [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]26,38] as well as viral presence in oral fluids [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study was performed on serum, feces, and oral fluid samples from 22 farms where PCV2 vaccination programs are in place and from 4 farms that do not vaccinate. In general, our findings support earlier observations that vaccination against PCV2 can significantly limit viremia and viral shedding in feces [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]26,38] as well as viral presence in oral fluids [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar differences were evident for fecal and oral fluid samples (Table S2, Figure 1). The majority of VAC2 farms apply PCV2 vaccination in sows and 6-week-old pigs, which has been suggested as being the most effective protocol [34,44]. In addition, in the VAC2 group, in Farms Q, T, and Y, no PCV2 viremia or shedding with feces was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, a significant difference was found between the groups, and group P revealed a significantly lower percentage compared to group S. This difference could be due to higher levels of IgG antibodies in group P compared to other groups and thus better protection against SD-PCV2. Another probable reason for the difference in the quality of semen between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals is that some of the unvaccinated piglets suffered from a subclinical form of the disease (Kumman et al 2011;Oliver-Ferrando et al 2016) which increases susceptibility to other infections (Opriessnig and Halbur 2012;P a r k et al 2014). Potential infection of the unvaccinated groups from another pathogen [e.g.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Цирковірусна хвороба ІІ типу -інфекційне захворювання, що набуло глобального значення серед популяції свиней та має значний економічний вплив на галузь свинарства (Chianini et al, 2003;Opriessnig et al, 2007;Alarcоn et al, 2013;Oliver-Ferrando et al, 2016).…”
Section: вступunclassified