2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-013-0356-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Navigation Sensors in Fire Smoke Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formsma et al (2011) similarly found that smoke appears to LiDAR as a solid object, whereas, Tretyakov and Linder (2011) demonstrated that camera measurements cannot even be made under similar conditions. More recently, a comparative study by Starr and Lattimer (2014) These observed LiDAR behaviours in smoke are similarly explainable using the elastic LiDAR equation described in this paper. Smoke particles are much smaller than dust, ranging 30 nm-800 nm, however mist and fog are comparable in size to mine dust and may range 1 µm -300e µm in diameter (Johnson, 1969).…”
Section: Other Low-visibility Conditionssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formsma et al (2011) similarly found that smoke appears to LiDAR as a solid object, whereas, Tretyakov and Linder (2011) demonstrated that camera measurements cannot even be made under similar conditions. More recently, a comparative study by Starr and Lattimer (2014) These observed LiDAR behaviours in smoke are similarly explainable using the elastic LiDAR equation described in this paper. Smoke particles are much smaller than dust, ranging 30 nm-800 nm, however mist and fog are comparable in size to mine dust and may range 1 µm -300e µm in diameter (Johnson, 1969).…”
Section: Other Low-visibility Conditionssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…2.4, challenges associated in producing dust-clouds of a defined character, and the difficulty of measuring/quantifying them. Knowledge of sensor performance in dust, or other particulates, from characterisation has been used to aid sensor selection (Starr and Lattimer, 2014;Tretyakov and 19 …”
Section: Characterising Sensor Performance In Dust Is An Inexact Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short wavelength devices, such as color cameras, infrared cameras and short wavelength thermal cameras, are not available in smoke environments [7]. Although long wavelength thermal cameras work well in smoke environments [7], it is required for fire localization to distinguish fire and other hot objects from thermal images. In a fire scene, there exist several hot objects, for example, fire, smoke, and objects heated by fire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, is being developed to locate and suppress fires inside ships and structures. Through the SAFFiR program, further advancements of artificial intelligent algorithms/ perception systems [7][8][9][10][11] and unmanned fire suppression systems [12] have been developed to enhance autonomous firefighting robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18,20,24,25,29,30] are not applicable to firefighting robots due to the high false positive rate from colors or reflection illuminations similar to that with fire [23]. Due to the fact that RGB cameras may operate in the visible to short wavelength infrared (IR) (less than 1 μm), they are not usable in smoke-filled environments where the visibility has sufficiently decreased [10,23]. In addition, because the performance of the cameras depends on light, these methods cannot provide proper information under local or global darkness, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%