Evaluation of new generation pesticides to control pod borer,Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea

Lekha,; Ameta, O. P.; Swami, Hemant

doi:10.18805/lr.v0iof.11040

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In soybean, resistant variety to pod sucker was controlled by genetic factors (Asadi et al, 2012), therefore, resistant varieties is very important due to differences in efficacy of different insecticides againts pest (Lekha et al 2017) and different response of varieties to planting seasons (Soundararajan and Chitra 2017). Breeding of soybean lines tolerant to drought has been conducted at the ILETRI and 13 soybean promising lines were obtained.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes

Suhartina¹,

Sari²,

Purwantoro³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pests and diseases infestations reduce the quantity and quality of seed yields. The objective of this study was to identify the correlation value between level of resistance to pests and chemical (fat and protein) concentrations of soybean genotypes. Methods: A total of 15 soybean genotypes were planted in field and glass house environments in 2017. Observations were made on the infestation intensity of pest and disease, dry seed yield, yield components and chemical (fat and protein) concentrations. Result: Soybean genotype DG-91-8 showed resistant (R) category to pod borer and pod sucker, while DM-122-35-17 showed resistant (R) category to army worm and pod borer. Two highest yielding genotypes (DG-91-8 and DG-99-32-14) had 15% higher seed yield than check variety Dering 1 (2.41 t/ha), with higher 100 seeds weight and pod number/plant. Fat concentration showed a significant positive correlation value with leaf rust disease. Pod suckers showed a significant positive correlation value with pod borer infestation, indicating that they had the same preference for soybean pods. Soybean genotypes DG-91-8 showed high seed yield (2.70 t/ha) and resistant (R) level to pod borer and pod sucker.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes

Suhartina¹,

Sari²,

Purwantoro³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The efficacy of different insecticides againts pod borer on chickpea has been reported by Lekha et al (2017). Although insecticides are effective against sucking pests and pod borer complex, development of resistance, residues in short duration crop and environmental hazards demand alternative ecofriendly methods of management (Soundararajan et al 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance Level of Mung Bean Genotypes to Pod Borer Maruca testulalis Geyer

Indiati¹,

Hapsari²,

Prayogo³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pod borer, Maruca testulalis is one of the harmful mung bean pests and cause substantial damage to the crop or failure to harvest. This study was carried out to identify the level of resistance to pod borer of mungbean accessions. Methods: Field research was conducted at Muneng Experimental Farm, Probolinggo, East Java, Indonesia in the 2018 dry season using the randomized block design and repeated two times. A total of 50 accessions of mungbeans were planted in two growing environments, namely: L1 = controlled environment (Maruca pest was controlled with NPV biopesticide 2 g/liter of water) and L2 = uncontrolled environment (Maruca pest was not controlled with any kind of pesticide). Observations were made on the intensity of borer attack and dry seed weight. Result: Eleven accessions gave a low resistant (LR) to moderately resistant (MR) categories responses against M. testulalis attacks. The pod damage from the eleven selected accessions was less than 15% under environmental conditions without control (L2). Control application (L1) reduced pod damage by 48.5% and increased mung bean seed yield by 25%, compared to without control (L2). The eleven accessions that were consistent or stable with low attack intensity under conditions with and without control gave dry seed weights above average, except for accessions (MLGV 0054, MLGV 0115 and MLGV 0320) which had dry seed weights lower than the average both in the growing environment with control (L1) or without control (L2).

show abstract

Evaluation of new generation pesticides to control pod borer,Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes

Correlation of Pests Resistance Levels and Seed Chemical Concentrations of Soybean Genotypes

Resistance Level of Mung Bean Genotypes to Pod Borer Maruca testulalis Geyer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About