2009
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00821-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of New Preanalysis Sample Treatment Tools and DNA Isolation Protocols To Improve Bacterial Pathogen Detection in Whole Blood

Abstract: Two novel preanalysis sample treatment tools were evaluated in combination with four DNA extraction kits for the selective isolation of bacterial DNA from whole blood. The combination of performing a preanalysis sample treatment and using a larger sample volume increased the detection limit to 50 CFU per ml.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
33
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimal handling was also favorable with regard to implementation of the rapid method in a high-throughput routine laboratory. The use of enzymes and bile products for selective removal of interacting sample material has previously been reported (28,31). Although those studies were based on samples of whole blood, the challenges are similar to those of the present study, i.e., high levels of PCR inhibitors and very low concentration of the targeted pathogen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minimal handling was also favorable with regard to implementation of the rapid method in a high-throughput routine laboratory. The use of enzymes and bile products for selective removal of interacting sample material has previously been reported (28,31). Although those studies were based on samples of whole blood, the challenges are similar to those of the present study, i.e., high levels of PCR inhibitors and very low concentration of the targeted pathogen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Studies have shown that PCR inhibitors can be reduced by physical, biochemical, immunological, and physiological sample preparation methods. These include flotation (18), filtration (9,20), adsorption and addition of surfactants (19), enzymatic digestion (9), DNA extraction (28), and enrichment in a PCR-compatible medium (15), all of which were considered when designing the described rapid method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be very challenging if genomic DNA is copurified with targeted microbial DNA (11)(12)(13). A number of solutions to this problem have been proposed (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) but, to date, none have achieved the desired sensitivity (20). It should be noted that many of these methods do appear to capture a significantly higher number of total positives than culture, and the "extra" detections are often correlated with clinical indications of bloodstream infection; however, an inability to capture all positives detected by culture (false negatives) has been an issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the reduced burden of human DNA is likely to improve the sensitivity and specificity of pathogen detection compared to other tests that are based on the isolation of total DNA from CSF samples. Using blood samples spiked with methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), bacterial DNA was detected by PCR with higher sensitivity in DNA extracts obtained with the preanalytical UMD-Liquid system than in total DNA extracts (16). Improved sensitivity over conventional diagnostics was also shown in clinical studies on patients with endocarditis, sepsis, and joint infections (12,17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%