2018
DOI: 10.1177/2331216518803198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Noise Reduction Algorithms in Hearing Aids for Multiple Signals From Equal or Different Directions

Abstract: One objective way to evaluate the effect of noise reduction algorithms in hearing aids is to measure the increase in signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). To this end, Hagerman and Olofsson presented a method where multiple recordings take place and the phase of one signal is inverted between the measurements. This phase inversion method allows one to separate signal and noise at the output of the hearing aid so that the increase in SNR can be evaluated. However, only two signals can be distinguished, for example, spee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the DM is frequency dependent (e.g., Ricketts, 2001), as the DM works better at lower frequencies. It also depends on the direction of the noise as noise from the back is reduced more compared to for example the noise from the sides (e.g., Husstedt et al, 2018). That is, the DM results not only in a spatial but also in a frequency dependent SNR improvement and is therefore rather different or more than simply changing the level of the noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the DM is frequency dependent (e.g., Ricketts, 2001), as the DM works better at lower frequencies. It also depends on the direction of the noise as noise from the back is reduced more compared to for example the noise from the sides (e.g., Husstedt et al, 2018). That is, the DM results not only in a spatial but also in a frequency dependent SNR improvement and is therefore rather different or more than simply changing the level of the noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify that there was only little interaction between the compression and NR, additional technical measurements were performed using the phase inversion method described by Hagerman and Olofsson (2004). The International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) signal and the spectrally matched IFnoise (European Hearing Instrument Manufacturers Association, 2016; Holube et al, 2010) were played back simultaneously at 65 dB SPL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In binaural HAs, it is crucial to preserve the ITDs, which becomes a challenging task in presence of unwanted side effects of HA algorithms [31,32]. In this context, the application of ITD models could serve as individual ITD reference data to continuously improve adaptive HA algorithms [33] and increase their robustness against physical imperfections, such as gain, position and phase errors in the HA microphone arrays [34], or detrimental acoustic conditions inflicted by noise sources or reverberation [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%