2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Non-Local Means Based Denoising Filters for Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Using a New Phantom

Abstract: Image denoising has a profound impact on the precision of estimated parameters in diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). This work first proposes an approach to constructing a DKI phantom that can be used to evaluate the performance of denoising algorithms in regard to their abilities of improving the reliability of DKI parameter estimation. The phantom was constructed from a real DKI dataset of a human brain, and the pipeline used to construct the phantom consists of diffusion-weighted (DW) image filtering, diffus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lack of a gold standard, accuracy of the IVIM parameter estimates could not be determined in vivo. To investigate transferability of the results of the in-silico simulations to the in-vivo situation, a ground truth was generated from the in-vivo measurements in a similar manner as proposed by Zhou et al [41]. The IVIM parameters in the resulting in-vivo ground truth agreed well with literature values (see Tables 1 and 2) [31, 42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the lack of a gold standard, accuracy of the IVIM parameter estimates could not be determined in vivo. To investigate transferability of the results of the in-silico simulations to the in-vivo situation, a ground truth was generated from the in-vivo measurements in a similar manner as proposed by Zhou et al [41]. The IVIM parameters in the resulting in-vivo ground truth agreed well with literature values (see Tables 1 and 2) [31, 42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For comparison with the in-silico simulations, a ground truth was generated from the in-vivo data using a similar approach as proposed by Zhou et al [41]. In the process, a) the DW image series were eddy-current corrected, motion compensated and coregistered, b) the DW image series were denoised using the JREC algorithm and subsequently averaged, and c) the IVIM parameter maps were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both the NR-NLM and NR-MS-NLM filters, h was set to the true input value of σ , as was found to be optimal in previous studies [1], [5]–[6], [24]–[27]. For both the NR-NLML and NR-MS-NLML filters, M was fixed to 50 and σ was set to the true input value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Wiest-Daesslé et al [26] extended the NLM filter to the multispectral case of diffusion tensor imaging of the brain, and found that the use of information acquired from different diffusion gradient directions improved upon classical denoising methods. In a more recent application of multispectral filtering, Zhou et al [27] found that the use of redundant information acquired with different b -values produced a reliable estimation of diffusion kurtosis in human brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various denoising methods have been developed to improve the quality of DW images, such as the Gaussian lter (30,31), anisotropic diffusion lter (32)(33)(34), linear minimum mean squared error lter (21), random matrix theory (35), multi-shell position-orientation-adaptive smoothing (36) and nonlocal means (NLM) lter (37,38). In particular, NLM lter has been suggested to signi cantly improve MR data quality by reducing Rician noise (20,(39)(40)(41) and implemented to DTI (42)(43)(44) and DKI (45) in the human brain. Moreover, NLM lter has shown to provide e ciency of noise removal while the ne structures and details of images are well preserved (40,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%