2012
DOI: 10.3109/1547691x.2012.684157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of non-radioactive endpoints ofex vivolocal lymph node assay-BrdU to investigate select contact sensitizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LLNA:BrdU-ELISA could be further improved by eliminating the need for in vivo injections. Until now, attempts to develop an assay in which harvested lymph node cells are labeled ex vivo with BrdU have been limited by the small number of chemicals and concentrations tested and, in some cases, the failure to test appropriate control chemicals (Piccotti et al, 2006;Suda et al, 2002;Ulker et al, 2011Ulker et al, , 2013. Here, we addressed these limitations by evaluating an ex vivo BrdU labeling procedure for the LLNA using a panel of known sensitizers with varying potencies and control chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LLNA:BrdU-ELISA could be further improved by eliminating the need for in vivo injections. Until now, attempts to develop an assay in which harvested lymph node cells are labeled ex vivo with BrdU have been limited by the small number of chemicals and concentrations tested and, in some cases, the failure to test appropriate control chemicals (Piccotti et al, 2006;Suda et al, 2002;Ulker et al, 2011Ulker et al, , 2013. Here, we addressed these limitations by evaluating an ex vivo BrdU labeling procedure for the LLNA using a panel of known sensitizers with varying potencies and control chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1999, the Interagency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) recommended the development and utilization of alternative LLNA endpoints (ICCVAM, 1999). One area selected for improvement involves the development of an LLNA protocol that does not require the use of radioisotope (Idehara et al, 2008;Jung et al, 2010;Kojima et al, 2011;Piccotti et al, 2006;Suda et al, 2002;Takeyoshi et al, 2001Takeyoshi et al, , 2003Takeyoshi et al, , 2005Ulker et al, 2013). A promising approach is to replace 3HTdR with its non-radioactive analog, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the in vivo and ex vivo assays were compatible both with one another and with standard radioactive LLNA results for dinitrochlorobenzene. Therefore, we concluded that the ex vivo BrdU incorporation method could be used as a viable alternative approach to assess the skin sensitization potential of the test compound in terms of improving animal welfare [9,11,12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this method is difficult in any laboratory because this radioisotope-based method (RI) requires special facilities and handling procedures. Several authors have conducted investigations for the development of an alternative non-RI method for performing LLNA [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%