2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care patient (The ENPIC study): Does nutrition really affect ICU mortality?

Abstract: Background & aims: The importance of artificial nutritional therapy is underrecognized, typically being considered an adjunctive rather than a primary therapy. We aimed to evaluate the influence of nutritional therapy on mortality in critically ill patients. Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study included adult patients needing artificial nutritional therapy for >48 h if they stayed in one of 38 participating intensive care units for !72 h between April and July 2018. Demographic data, comor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with the recent update of the ASPEN guidelines suggesting a lower energy target, between 12 and 20 kcal/kg/d, during the first week of the ICU [ 11 ]. A similar observation was made by Servia-Goixart et al in a multicentre prospective study that included 639 critically ill patients, where a multivariable analysis adjusted for patient characteristics and severity showed that a higher mean energy intake was associated with mortality [ 51 ]. However, the authors reported a protective effect associated with the mean protein intake that did not match our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This finding is in line with the recent update of the ASPEN guidelines suggesting a lower energy target, between 12 and 20 kcal/kg/d, during the first week of the ICU [ 11 ]. A similar observation was made by Servia-Goixart et al in a multicentre prospective study that included 639 critically ill patients, where a multivariable analysis adjusted for patient characteristics and severity showed that a higher mean energy intake was associated with mortality [ 51 ]. However, the authors reported a protective effect associated with the mean protein intake that did not match our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, the latest large-scale study on practical nutritional management for ICU patients receiving artificial nutrition [ 20 ] reports that PN was initiated on the second to third day (38 h) of ICU admission, which was close to our study results of the third day of ICU admission. In addition, a multicenter observational study conducted recently [ 21 ] demonstrated the association between an increase in the amino acid dose and a decrease in mortality, although the relationship between the energy dose and mortality was small, which supports our study results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, barrier factors influencing enteral feeding include delay in the start of EN, low infusion rate, lack of standardized and failure to follow EN protocols, disruptions to EN (e.g., diagnostic testing, accidental pull-out of nasogastric tubing, gastrointestinal intolerance), insufficient dietitian coverage, and prioritize other aspects of patient care over nutrition ( 19–22 ). Despite these factors can be overcome by improving adherence to guidelines, there are some ICU patients not able to tolerate prescribed EN due to the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications (e.g., high gastric residual volumes, diarrhea, vomiting), leading to the lack of optimal nutrient provision ( 23 , 24 ). In consequence, this suboptimal EN intake may worsen nutritional status, which is associated with higher complications (e.g., infections) and higher mortality ( 25 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%