2018
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of occupational exposure to static magnetic field in MRI sites based on body pose estimation and SMF analytical computation

Abstract: This paper tackles the problem of estimating exposure to static magnetic field (SMF) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sites using a non-invasive approach. The proposed approach relies on a vision-based system to detect people's body parts and on a mathematical model to compute SMF exposure. A multi-view camera system was used to capture the MRI room, and a vision-based system was applied to detect body parts. The detected localization was then fed into a mathematical model to compute SMF exposure. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dB/dt peak values have been compared with the reference level (RL) proposed by ICNIRP. Similar measurements were carried out later [33] in different MRI facilities for two classes of MRI workers concluding that the RL always exceeds during measurements on the 3.0 T scanner and sometimes on 1.5 T. Finally, Belguerras et al [34] combined an analytical model to estimate the magnetic field exposure during movements, with a vision-based system to detect the person's body parts. In this study, a home-made personal dosimeter [36] was also used to measure the magnetic field at the neck level of the worker and validate the proposed approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dB/dt peak values have been compared with the reference level (RL) proposed by ICNIRP. Similar measurements were carried out later [33] in different MRI facilities for two classes of MRI workers concluding that the RL always exceeds during measurements on the 3.0 T scanner and sometimes on 1.5 T. Finally, Belguerras et al [34] combined an analytical model to estimate the magnetic field exposure during movements, with a vision-based system to detect the person's body parts. In this study, a home-made personal dosimeter [36] was also used to measure the magnetic field at the neck level of the worker and validate the proposed approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The magnetic flux density map obtained by this model was then compared with the data obtained by isogauss lines (approximated to ellipses) which have been interpolated using first a triangulation-based natural neighbor interpolation (below "natural") and then a piecewise exponential model (below "exponential") [27]. Accuracy of the model was evaluated using the Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE) [34] calculated between simulated and measured data as follow:…”
Section: B Magnetic Flux Density Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%