2017
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1282106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of opt-out inpatient HIV screening at an urban teaching hospital

Abstract: This study evaluated opt-out inpatient HIV screening delivered by admitting physicians, and compared number of HIV tests and diagnoses to signs and symptoms-directed HIV testing (based on physician orders) in the emergency department (ED). The opt-out inpatient HIV screening program was conducted over a one year period in patients who were admitted to the 386-bed University of California San Diego (UCSD) teaching hospital. Numbers of HIV tests and diagnoses were compared to those observed among ED patients who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both community-based HIV screening programs and routine testing in EDs may therefore have a combined effect on reducing HIV transmission and infection in the community. The rate of 0.26% new HIV diagnoses found in this analysis is also lower than the rate of 0.43% new HIV diagnoses found in a hospital opt-out HIV screening program conducted in San Diego in 2009 24 , which may be attributed to the effectiveness of HIV-screening programs in San Diego.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Both community-based HIV screening programs and routine testing in EDs may therefore have a combined effect on reducing HIV transmission and infection in the community. The rate of 0.26% new HIV diagnoses found in this analysis is also lower than the rate of 0.43% new HIV diagnoses found in a hospital opt-out HIV screening program conducted in San Diego in 2009 24 , which may be attributed to the effectiveness of HIV-screening programs in San Diego.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Regarding rapid test implementation, different challenges have been described in the literature, including patient's acceptance of the test, the application of the test by health staff, or the adequate integration of health systems for a proper linkage to care. 32,36,37 In our study, there was a very good acceptance rate for the test and the main barrier was the lack of offering and execution of the test by the nursing staff. We found the same barriers to implementation reported in other clinical settings, which are mainly physician-led, mostly due to lack of time or work overload.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We found the same barriers to implementation reported in other clinical settings, which are mainly physician-led, mostly due to lack of time or work overload. 32,36 Strategies need to be established, such as staff education, to raise staff awareness and improve the test coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the acceptability and to describe the predictors of acceptance or refusal of HIV opt-out inpatient testing, surveys were offered to two samples: a) adult patients admitted to the hospital who had been offered an HIV test upon admission over a 3-month period and b) the medical staff of the hospital who offered the HIV tests. The survey consisted of a 5-point Likert-scale and multiple-choice questions [55]. In another study, the acceptability of a mobile health intervention to improve HIV care coordination for PLHIV with co-morbidities was evaluated by applying an interview approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%