Evaluation of optimized variable area transect sampling using totally enumerated field data sets

Abstract

SUMMARYPlotless density estimators (PDEs) can be efficient alternatives to quadrat sampling for estimating the density of stationary objects. Variable area transect (VAT) sampling had been identified, and optimized relative to effort, in previous Monte Carlo simulated population studies as a low-labor field method that demonstrated superior estimation properties among many PDEs considered. However, natural populations tend to be much more complex and less predictable in spatial distribution than computer generated populations. Therefore, we carried out a Monte Carlo simulation study that used 17 fully enumerated field populations rather than simulated populations. These natural populations represented a variety of population densities and spatial patterns. We focused on assessing the effect of the number of population members searched for along each transect (r), sample size, and transect width on estimation quality. Using relative root mean-squared error and relative bias as criteria, the optimal range for r was 5 to 7 population members encountered from each start point. Sample size was best if n > 20, but returns in estimation quality diminished by n ¼ 40. Transect width was previously uninvestigated and found to be the most important design factor affecting estimation quality. Field studies should strive for transects as wide as logistically reasonable. Published in 2005 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Relations entre la diversité et la biomasse aérienne des espèces arborescentes dans les agroforêts traditionnelles à base de cacaoyers: Cas de la localité de Lakota (Côte d’Ivoire)

“…La méthode a l'avantage de permettre l'exploration des résultats indépendamment de la surface échantillonnée (Parker, 1979 ;Engeman et al, 2005).…”

Adaptive roadside sampling for bark beetle damage assessment

“…Furthermore, it is often recommended to use a strip as wide as possible so as to increase the detection efficiency (e.g. Engeman et al, 2005, for variable area transect sampling). In our case study, we made a field survey to determine the maximum distance at which 100% of attacked trees could be sighted from the forest road (D max ) and showed that it varied with tree density.…”

“…It seems to offer a good compromise between the accuracy of the estimates and investment in field work. It has been successfully tested on different crop damages of various densities but only at the stand scale (Engeman et al, 2005).…”

Design-Unbiased Estimation and Alternatives for Sampling Trees on Plantation Rows

“…The method suggested by Borders et al [4] of sampling a fixed number of trees along a variable section of a plantation row may be similar in principle to a variable-length transect. Several simulation studies indicated positive results from variable area transect sampling ( [31][32][33]). However, variable area transects were found to have significant bias towards a clustered spatial distribution by Engman et al [34].…”