Evaluation of outcomes of surgical treatment for degenerative diseases of the spine

Гуща, А. О.; Yusupova, A.R.

doi:10.14531/ss2017.4.85-94

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It provides a diagnostic tool to measure the level of functional impairment experienced by a person suffering from low BP. The questionnaire consists of 24 items related to physical activity (15), sleep and rest (3), psychosocial issues (2), housekeeping (2), food intake (1) and frequency of pain (1). It is designed to be completed in about 5 minutes without any outside help, i.e.…”

Section: Scales For Assessing the Quality Of Life In Patients With Ba...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1

Trefilova¹,

Shnayder

Novitsky³

et al. 2022

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.

show abstract

Section: Scales For Assessing the Quality Of Life In Patients With Ba...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) using standardized scales and questionnaires to be filled in has become a daily practice for clinical studies in many spinal surgery centers in Europe and a number of clinics in Russia in patients with BP [15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1

Trefilova¹,

Shnayder

Novitsky³

et al. 2022

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is determined the correlation between some human diseases and somatotype. Somatotype to some extent can be a marker of a particular human nosology [6,7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative characteristics of morphological features

Kolokoltsev¹,

Кузнецова²,

Jagiełło³

et al. 2020

PES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Study Aim. The purpose of the study is to give a comparative description of the somatotypes, anatomical components of the body, and motor qualities of female students studied at the university (Irkutsk, Russia) in 2009 and 2019. Material and methods. It was conducted the survey and somatotypological diagnosis of 1226 female students (in 2009 – n = 762; in 2019 – n = 464) on 27 anthropometric parameters. It was measured: Pinier index; the average value of the absolute and percentage of the bone component of the body (BC), the fat component of the body (FC), and muscle component of the body (MC). The following indicators were evaluated by motor tests: speed endurance and agility; speed; speed and strength endurance of the trunk flexor muscles; strength and endurance of the shoulder girdle muscles; dynamic strength of the lower limb muscles; active flexibility of the spine; overall endurance. Results. In 2019, compared to 2009, there was observed: a decrease (by 19.6%) in the number of normosthenic females; an increase in the number of hypersthenics (by 70.9%), and asthenics (by 27.4%); body weight gain; decrease in body length. The values of the following indicators significantly decreased in 2019: the trunk length, upper and lower limbs; chest circumference. There was a decrease in the average values of body circumference; shoulder width. It was observed an increase in pelvic width. In 2019, compared to 2009, the following indicators were determined in females of all somatotypes: a significant increase in body fat content and a decrease in muscle mass (p <0.05). As a result, the strength of the hands' dynamometry decreased. After 10 years, the bone component in the females’ body has not changed. Conclusions. The obtained data indicate a deterioration in all motor skills of females surveyed in 2019, compared to 2009. This is a consequence of the growing hypodynamics of modern youth. The obtained results of surveys expand the database of anthropometric and motor parameters of the young generation of Russia. This data can be used in planning training and coaching activities in educational and sports organizations.

show abstract