2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in Rwanda during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

Thierry Habyarimana,
Alexis Nshimiyimana,
William Niyonzima
et al.

Abstract: COVID-19 is mainly described as endothelial dysfunction, and due to the bidirectional link between oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, we initiated a program directed to the evaluation of the oxidative status of the population of Rwanda by measuring spectrophotometrically their plasma Reactive Oxygen Metabolites (d-ROMs) and Plasma Antioxidant Potential (PAT). The reference population was chosen to reflect the absence of actual or past SARS-CoV-2 infections as well as other clinically established inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study was limited to a single blood sample, so we cannot provide an assessment of the changes in serum OSBs between days 1 and 15 of the intervention. However, the original data on d-ROM, PAT, and OSI levels in healthy 5–6-year-old Caucasian children may help fill the existing gap in lack of a universally accepted interval of normality [ 36 ]. d-ROMs in our participants ranged in value that was similar to d-ROMs in healthy 2–6-year-old Japanese children [ 9 ] but higher than d-ROMs in healthy 4-year-old Macedonian children [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was limited to a single blood sample, so we cannot provide an assessment of the changes in serum OSBs between days 1 and 15 of the intervention. However, the original data on d-ROM, PAT, and OSI levels in healthy 5–6-year-old Caucasian children may help fill the existing gap in lack of a universally accepted interval of normality [ 36 ]. d-ROMs in our participants ranged in value that was similar to d-ROMs in healthy 2–6-year-old Japanese children [ 9 ] but higher than d-ROMs in healthy 4-year-old Macedonian children [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%