2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of passive confinement in CFT columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main conclusion was that the ductility, more than carrying capacity, was the major benefit of confinement (Oliveira et al, 2009;Simões, 2008). The influence of the length-to-diameter ratio of concrete-filled tube columns also was analysed, showing a reduction of confinement benefits for slender columns (Oliveira et al, 2010). General views of the specimens tested by Oliveira et al (2009) andOliveira et al (2010) are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Composite Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusion was that the ductility, more than carrying capacity, was the major benefit of confinement (Oliveira et al, 2009;Simões, 2008). The influence of the length-to-diameter ratio of concrete-filled tube columns also was analysed, showing a reduction of confinement benefits for slender columns (Oliveira et al, 2010). General views of the specimens tested by Oliveira et al (2009) andOliveira et al (2010) are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Composite Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing this the compressive capacity of the RAC can be considerably increased due to the confinement effects at the ultimate condition (e.g. [10][11][12]), and the shrinkage and creep deformation can be reduced by 1/2-2/3 as the concrete core is under sealed condition (e.g. [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the radial confining pressure acting in the circular concrete core (Hatzigeorgiou, 2008;Johansson, 2002;Suthansa et al, 2001), circular CFST columns are much better confined than square and rectangular CFST columns (Lee et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2010) under uniaxial compression. Nevertheless, arching action will be developed in the plane of cross-section between the corners of the steel tube, where the restraint provided to concrete is the largest, due to tube bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%