2001
DOI: 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0457:eopsgf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Patient Selection Guidelines for Endoluminal AAA Repair With the Zenith Stent-Graft:The Australasian Experience

Abstract: Proximal neck contour, length, and diameter are the most important criteria in terms of endoleak development. Breaching the proximal neck length criterion resulted in a 4-fold increase in endoleak, and combined deviations from the guidelines multiplied the effect. Necks < or = 10 mm long are unsuitable for the standard Zenith graft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,18 Other commercially available endografts, such as the Zenith TriFab, Excluder, Talent, and Powerlink, have been advocated as suitable for proximal neck (and CIA) angles only up to 60u and if all other neck criteria are within the guidelines. 5,13,17,23,24 Indeed, for infrarenal neck angulations up to 60u, equivalent primary and long-term success rates can be achieved more or less with all these previously mentioned devices, although the Zenith stent-graft seems to perform better in the context of less favorable neck morphology. 8,25 The Zenith Composite and the Anaconda endografts have been suggested as potentially suitable for neck angles .60u; however, little evidence yet exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,18 Other commercially available endografts, such as the Zenith TriFab, Excluder, Talent, and Powerlink, have been advocated as suitable for proximal neck (and CIA) angles only up to 60u and if all other neck criteria are within the guidelines. 5,13,17,23,24 Indeed, for infrarenal neck angulations up to 60u, equivalent primary and long-term success rates can be achieved more or less with all these previously mentioned devices, although the Zenith stent-graft seems to perform better in the context of less favorable neck morphology. 8,25 The Zenith Composite and the Anaconda endografts have been suggested as potentially suitable for neck angles .60u; however, little evidence yet exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] Conventional wisdom is that a severely tortuous infrarenal aorta and neck angulation .60u constitute contraindications for use of the current commercially available AAA endografts. 3 However, these criteria are somewhat arbitrary, and the true limits have not been adequately tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3]5,13 The evolution of the Zenith system was influenced by the problems identified in those early experiences. 4,[6][7][8][9] Conceptually, this stent-graft was based on 3 essential features incorporated into the original design, which has been enhanced over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via bilateral common femoral arteriotomies, the Zenith stent-grafts were placed as previously described. 4,[6][7][8][9] Sixty-eight (77.3%) bifurcated stent-grafts, 18 of which were the TriFab system, and 20 (22.7%) aortomonoiliac devices were used. In most cases, the stent-graft was oversized 4 to 6 mm larger than the aortic implantation site and 2 to 3 mm larger than the iliac implantation sites.…”
Section: Implantation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation