2015
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1084.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Peach and Nectarine Hybrids Using SSR Marker Assisted Selection Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many SSR markers for different Prunus species [32] as peach and nectarine [30,33,34], apricot [35][36][37][38]. SSR markers were also used for identification of hybrids in apricot [39]. It is well known that the selection of markers usually depends on the nature of the germplasm under study and in many cases the existence of a set of markers applied for the identification of germplasm collections was useful but not totally transferable to the others.…”
Section: Joj Horticulture and Arboriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many SSR markers for different Prunus species [32] as peach and nectarine [30,33,34], apricot [35][36][37][38]. SSR markers were also used for identification of hybrids in apricot [39]. It is well known that the selection of markers usually depends on the nature of the germplasm under study and in many cases the existence of a set of markers applied for the identification of germplasm collections was useful but not totally transferable to the others.…”
Section: Joj Horticulture and Arboriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many SSR markers have been developed for different Prunus species [17], including peach and nectarine [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and apricot [25,26]. Besides allowing DNA fingerprinting and phylogenetic relationship evaluation in Prunus germplasm [27][28][29], SSR markers have also proved to be useful for the identification of different peach and nectarine hybrids [30], the differentiation of closely related genotypes [31] and the identification of important agronomic traits through QTL mapping [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%