2020
DOI: 10.1080/25765299.2020.1862985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of performance fatigability through surface EMG in health and muscle disease: state of the art

Abstract: In literature, it is commonly reported that the progress of performance fatigability may be indirectly assessed through the changes in the features of the surface electromyogram (sEMG) signal. In particular, during isometric constant force contractions, changes in the sEMG signal are caused by several physiological factors, such as a decay in muscle fibers conduction velocity (CV), an increase of the degree of synchronization between the firing times of simultaneously active motor units (MUs), by the central n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 219 publications
(267 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FD is the slope of the interpolation line (as determined by the least mean squared method). Performance fatigability was indirectly calculated as the slopes (% of rate of change) of the considered sEMG variables (CV and FD) ( 14 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…FD is the slope of the interpolation line (as determined by the least mean squared method). Performance fatigability was indirectly calculated as the slopes (% of rate of change) of the considered sEMG variables (CV and FD) ( 14 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Enoka and Duchateau (13), performance fatigability is typically quantified as the decline in an objective measure of performance over a discrete period, while perceived fatigability refers to changes in the sensations that regulate the integrity of the performer. Many factors interact and contribute to performance fatigability (14)(15)(16). These factors may be classified as central or peripheral.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations