2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-0101-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of performance of different surface-engineered yeast strains for direct ethanol production from raw starch

Abstract: Four types of cell-surface-engineered yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae displaying glucoamylase, namely, systems A, B, C, and D, were constructed to evaluate their performance in direct ethanol fermentation from raw corn starch. Systems A and B were glucoamylase-displaying nonflocculent yeast (YF237) types that secrete alpha-amylase into the culture medium and codisplay alpha-amylase on the cell surface, respectively. Systems C and D were flocculent yeast counterparts (YF207) for systems A and B, respectively. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From soluble starch, the S. cerevisiae F2 and F6 produced high ethanol levels and their fermentative abilities were similar to those of previously engineered strains. 16,27,28 The conversion rate of starch to ethanol was found to be much more efficient in the case of S. cerevisiae F2 (data not shown). However, both recombinant yeasts were not able to metabolize all the starch available and the same result was observed from raw starch where the recombinants produced limited ethanol concentrations ( Table 2).…”
Section: Onsolidated Bioprocessing (Cbp)mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From soluble starch, the S. cerevisiae F2 and F6 produced high ethanol levels and their fermentative abilities were similar to those of previously engineered strains. 16,27,28 The conversion rate of starch to ethanol was found to be much more efficient in the case of S. cerevisiae F2 (data not shown). However, both recombinant yeasts were not able to metabolize all the starch available and the same result was observed from raw starch where the recombinants produced limited ethanol concentrations ( Table 2).…”
Section: Onsolidated Bioprocessing (Cbp)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Laboratory strains are easily genetically modified and the functionality of starch hydrolyzing enzymes has been proved by various laboratories. 15,16 Episomal plasmid vectors under selection have been mainly utilized for the overexpression of target genes in laboratory S. cerevisiae strains to ensure high copy numbers (50-200 copies) are maintained. Despite these advantages, most industrial yeasts are much more robust than laboratory strains and display higher specific ethanol productivities and ethanol yields, producing a lower amount of undesirable by-products, like glycerol.…”
Section: Onsolidated Bioprocessing (Cbp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineers expressed glucoamylase either alone (177,303) or in combination with ␣-amylase (81,163,315) or even with pullulanase (136). Many approaches have relied on anchoring starch-degrading enzymes on the yeast cell surface using the Flo1 protein (163,177,303,315).…”
Section: Bioethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C-terminus of a-agglutinin has been successfully used to display several foreign proteins such as a-amylase and red sea bream iridovirus 380R antigen on surface of S. cerevisiae. 7,8 More recently, the use of the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has been used to display enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) and K. lactis yellow enzyme (KYE) using the a-agglutinin C-terminal anchoring method. Methanol-inducible P. pastoris expression vectors are also commercially available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%