2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of performance of port structures during earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many reasons causing port closure, such as labor strike, terrorist attack, natural disaster, etc., one of which should be the earthquake. In recent years, significant damages to port facilities resulting from earthquakes in U.S. and Haiti have obviously illustrated that strong earthquake can severely affect port facilities, especially wharves [2]. The 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake caused considerable damages to pile-supported wharf at 7th Street Terminal of the Port of Oakland, and the damages mainly occurred at the pile-deck connections [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many reasons causing port closure, such as labor strike, terrorist attack, natural disaster, etc., one of which should be the earthquake. In recent years, significant damages to port facilities resulting from earthquakes in U.S. and Haiti have obviously illustrated that strong earthquake can severely affect port facilities, especially wharves [2]. The 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake caused considerable damages to pile-supported wharf at 7th Street Terminal of the Port of Oakland, and the damages mainly occurred at the pile-deck connections [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic analyses and fragility curves (Akiyama et al, 2020;Burns Patrick et al, 2021) are examples of multi-hazard approaches that aim to determine the occurrence probability of both phenomena simultaneously and the expected level of damage of structures after them. Recent multi-hazard literature has focused on structures in the urban environment such as buildings and bridges (Attary et al, 2021;Burns Patrick et al, 2021;Ishibashi et al, 2021;Karafagka et al, 2018), while little attention has been paid to the response of road networks to sequential earthquake-tsunami processes (Iai, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the simulation models available to assess the individual effects of earthquake and tsunami loads on transport infrastructure, a few, limited modelling approaches to predict sequential damage and effects are available. From a review of the literature on fragility and vulnerability models, it was seen that most studies focus on individual transport components or networks, usually considering only one hazard at a time (Argyroudis and Kaynia, 2015;Argyroudis and Mitoulis, 2021;Briaud and Maddah, 2016;Iai, 2019;Maruyama et al, 2010;NIBS, 2004). The studies mentioned focus mainly on the vulnerability of bridges and tunnels, and the main emphasis is on ground movement due to seismic excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7]. Fully coupled dynamic consolidation analysis has been carried out by Madabushi and Zeng [31] for gravity walls; by Alyami et al [1], Iai and coworkers et al [23][24][25] and Tashiro [48], who considered different types of quay walls with the main objective of modeling the occurrence of dynamic liquefaction; by Morigi et al [35] and Wang et al [49], who analyzed excavations supported by cantilevered or anchored diaphragm walls in saturated sands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%