2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.011110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of phase retrieval approaches in magnified X-ray phase nano computerized tomography applied to bone tissue

Abstract: , et al.. Evaluation of phase retrieval approaches in magnified X-ray phase nano computerized tomography applied to bone tissue. Optics Express, Optical Society of America, 2018, 26 (9) Abstract: X-ray phase contrast imaging offers higher sensitivity compared to conventional X-ray attenuation imaging and can be simply implemented by propagation when using a partially coherent synchrotron beam. We address the phase retrieval in in-line phase nano-CT using multiple propagation distances. We derive a method which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase retrieval consisted in processing the four projections recorded at the different propagation distances for each rotation angle to obtain a phase map. Following a previous study 37 , this was performed based on an extended Paganin's algorithm, followed by an iterative optimization. Tomographic reconstruction was then achieved by using the Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) algorithm implemented at the ESRF within the PyHST2 software 38 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase retrieval consisted in processing the four projections recorded at the different propagation distances for each rotation angle to obtain a phase map. Following a previous study 37 , this was performed based on an extended Paganin's algorithm, followed by an iterative optimization. Tomographic reconstruction was then achieved by using the Filtered Back-Projection (FBP) algorithm implemented at the ESRF within the PyHST2 software 38 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample was scanned at four different focus‐to‐sample distances, which was shown to provide the best image quality for such samples (see Figure 1). 33 The beam energy was 17 and 33.6 keV during different data collection sessions. For each distance, 1800 or 2000 projections were recorded over the angular range of 180°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the aim of this work is to present a method including image acquisition and data processing to extract 3D quantitative parameters of the LCN in human bone. Imaging was performed using magnified X‐ray phase nanocomputerised tomography (CT) at the beamline ID16A of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France 33 . The setup provides reconstructed volumes 2048 3 with a voxel size of 120 nm on a field of view of 246 μm in the three spatial directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, µ is the gradient step size, and R is defined as in (1). According to the above procedures, x ij is recovered from Z ij , then we can get X i .…”
Section: A Recovery Of the Phases Of The Mixed Image Signalsxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T HE problem of recovering a one-dimensional signal from its Fourier transform magnitude, known as phase retrieval, is of paramount importance in various engineering and scientific applications, such as X-ray crystallography [1], [2], optics [3], [4], astronomy [5], [6], blind channel estimation [7], [8], and blind image deblurring [9], [10]. This problem has a long history and has been studied by many researchers [3], [11]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%