2018
DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i7.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of pineal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: AIMTo evaluate radiological imaging findings of patients who had been found to have pineal cyst (PC) in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).METHODSA total of 9546 patients who had brain MRI examination in March 2010-January 2018 period were studied. Fifty-six patients (44 female and 12 male) found to have PC were evaluated. Eighteen of the patients had had follow-up examinations of 2-94 mo (mean 30.50 ± 28.83). PC dimensions and volume, radiological imaging features (signal intensities, contours, internal s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may be challenging to determine a precise radiological differentiation between the pineal cyst and cystic pineocytomas, gliomas or even pineoblastomas. [21,13]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it may be challenging to determine a precise radiological differentiation between the pineal cyst and cystic pineocytomas, gliomas or even pineoblastomas. [21,13]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As concluded by some authors, despite the advances in high-resolution MRI, there are not definite radiological methods to distinguish benign pineal cysts from pineal region malignancies containing cystic components such as pineocytomas, pineoblastomas, germinomas, or mature teratomas. [21,38]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of benign pineal cysts (PCs) ranges between 0.6 and 23% in the general population [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and is as high as 40% in autoptic series [8]. This large range in reported prevalence is explained by the different types of MRI machine used for the respective studies, the different methods used in defining PC size, and the various types of design and population studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]9]. One large study on children and young people in particular showed a PC prevalence of 2% in people under 25 years of age [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pineal cysts were considered typical when unilocular, smooth edged, with homogeneous interior content in every MRI sequence and with a diameter of at least 6 mm [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%