2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-012-0232-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of planning and management approaches for limiting residential encroachment impacts within forest edges: A Southern Ontario case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, policy tools appear to be focused on protecting natural systems from development into alternative urban land uses, and the anticipated impacts of development, not on protecting natural systems from the impacts resulting from the use of the adjacent developed land. This finding is supported by a study that found Ontario municipal development planners believed they were required to ensure developers mitigated largely short term construction-related impacts of development versus those occurring following development (McWilliam et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, policy tools appear to be focused on protecting natural systems from development into alternative urban land uses, and the anticipated impacts of development, not on protecting natural systems from the impacts resulting from the use of the adjacent developed land. This finding is supported by a study that found Ontario municipal development planners believed they were required to ensure developers mitigated largely short term construction-related impacts of development versus those occurring following development (McWilliam et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These less authoritative policies and practices were not evaluated in this study, but were the focus of a previous study (See McWilliam et al, 2013).…”
Section: Policy Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation