Evaluation of postoperative results from videoarthroscopic treatment for recurrent shoulder dislocation using metal anchors

Martel, Éder Menegassi; Rodrigues, Airton; Neto, Francisco José dos Santos; Dahmer, Cleiton; Ranzzi, Abel; Dubiela, Rafaella Scuzziato

doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2015.03.015

Cited by 4 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nenhum estudo fazia seguimento com o tempo de avaliação padronizado, e 5 estudos 16 17 18 19 20 (42%) tinham tempo de seguimento mínimo dos pacientes maior do que 2 anos. Dez estudos 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (83%) eram séries de caso (nível de evidência IV), 1 (8%) estudo caso-controle 16 (nível de evidência III), e 1 coorte retrospectivo 19 (nível de evidência III). Não encontramos estudos randomizados ou coortes prospectivos.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Quatro estudos 16 22 24 26 (33%) avaliaram os resultados do tratamento da instabilidade glenoumeral anterior por via aberta, 3 (25%) estudavam a cirurgia de Latarjet-Patte, 16 22 26 e 1 (8%) estudou o reparo da lesão labial. 24 Em 8 publicações, 17 18 19 20 21 23 25 27 (66%) o reparo artroscópico das lesões labiais anteriores foi a técnica empregada, um desses avaliava o resultado desse procedimento associado ao remplissage da lesão de Hill-Sachs. 23 A média de desfechos avaliados por estudo foi de 3,7 ± 1,7 ( Fig.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…There were no prospective randomized studies or prospective cohorts, and 83% of the papers referred to case series (level IV of evidence). 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 ). Em 7 publicações 16 17 19 22 23 24 26 (58%) foram usadas 2 escalas de avaliação; 3 estudos 18 20 27 (25%) apresentaram os resultados por apenas 1 questionário, e 2, 25 (17%) não usaram escalas ou questionários de avaliação.…”

Section: Escalas E Questionários De Avaliaçãounclassified

“…Dez estudos 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 25 26 27 (83%) relataram as complicações relacionadas ao tratamento cirúrgico. A complicação mais frequentemente relatada foi a recidiva da instabilidade glenoumeral, encontrada nos 10 estudos (83%).…”

Section: Complicaçõesunclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Instabilidade glenoumeral anterior: Revisão sistemática dos desfechos usados no Brasil

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review involving the six major international orthopedic journals has been published recently. It described the tools used for the evaluation of outcomes in the surgical treatment of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder. There are no studies that exhibit the main outcome tools for this disease in Brazil. The authors evaluated the outcomes of clinical studies involving anterior glenohumeral instability that were published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals, Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira . A review of the literature was performed, including all clinical papers published between 2007 and 2016 describing at least one outcome measure before and after surgical intervention. The outcomes were range of motion, muscle strength, physical examination testing, patient satisfaction, return to sports, imaging, complications, and functional outcomes scores. Twelve studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability were published. Ten studies (83%) were case series (level of evidence IV), 1 (8%) was a case-control study (III), and 1 was a retrospective cohort (III). On average, the number of outcomes assessed was 3.7 ± 1.7. The Rowe score was used in 9 studies (75%), and 7 (58%) papers used the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Ten studies (83%) reported complications related to surgical treatment. The complication most frequently reported was recurrent instability, found in 9 studies (75%). The national studies have preferentially used scales considered to be of low reliability, responsiveness, and internal consistency.

show abstract

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…There were no prospective randomized studies or prospective cohorts, and 83% of the papers referred to case series (level IV of evidence). 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Escalas E Questionários De Avaliaçãounclassified

Section: Complicaçõesunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Instabilidade glenoumeral anterior: Revisão sistemática dos desfechos usados no Brasil

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Sex-specific differences in outcomes after anterior shoulder surgical stabilization: a meta-analysis and systematic review of literature

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All-suture anchors versus metal suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A comparison of mid-term outcomes

Uluyardımcı¹

2021

Jt Dis Relat Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aims to compare metal suture anchors and all-suture anchors clinically and radiologically in arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients and methods In this retrospective study, 67 patients (61 males, 6 females; mean age 26.0±5.8; range, 18 to 43 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between April 2009 and October 2016 were divided into two groups depending on the type of the suture anchor used in different periods. Group A comprised 32 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with metal suture anchors, and Group B comprised 35 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with all-suture anchors. The patients were clinically evaluated using Rowe scores, Constant scores, redislocation rates, and positive apprehension test rates. Radiographic evaluation was performed using the Samilson-Prieto classification to observe the development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Results The mean follow-up period was 41.1±10.4 (range, 30 to 60) months in Group A, and 39.6±9.4 (range, 28 to 60) months in Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.559). No significant difference was observed between Group A and Group B in terms of mean Rowe score (89.2±13.8 [range, 40 to 100] vs. 88.7±16.9 [range, 25 to 100]; p=0.895) or Constant score (87.2±8.9 [range, 48 to 96] vs. 86.9±9.0 [range, 46 to 96]; p=0.878), which were the clinical outcomes at the final follow-up examination. Postoperative redislocation rates (3.1% vs. 2.9%, p=1.0) and positive apprehension test rates (6.3% vs. 8.6%, p=1.0) were found to be similar in both groups. According to the Samilson-Prieto classification, there was no evidence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in any of the patients in either group. Conclusion Satisfactory outcomes were obtained with the use of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. All-suture anchors and metal suture anchors, have similar outcomes in the mid-term and all-suture anchors are a reliable and effective option for arthroscopic Bankart repair.

show abstract

Evaluation of postoperative results from videoarthroscopic treatment for recurrent shoulder dislocation using metal anchors

Cited by 4 publications

References 25 publications

Instabilidade glenoumeral anterior: Revisão sistemática dos desfechos usados no Brasil

Instabilidade glenoumeral anterior: Revisão sistemática dos desfechos usados no Brasil

Sex-specific differences in outcomes after anterior shoulder surgical stabilization: a meta-analysis and systematic review of literature

All-suture anchors versus metal suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A comparison of mid-term outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About