2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of potential bias in observing fish with a DIDSON acoustic camera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Target length was negatively correlated with the vertical direction and tortuosity . The estimated fish length agrees well with the actual length when the fish is positioned perpendicular to the centre of the multi-beam array (Tušer et al, 2014). In the present study, targets almost perpendicular to the beam axis were selected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Target length was negatively correlated with the vertical direction and tortuosity . The estimated fish length agrees well with the actual length when the fish is positioned perpendicular to the centre of the multi-beam array (Tušer et al, 2014). In the present study, targets almost perpendicular to the beam axis were selected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Tušer et al . () noticed that length estimates were decreasing at off‐centre position of the beam. They explained it by a combination of the signal intensity of individual beams and the manner of fish reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Working with a wider side aspect angle range, using tethered fish, Tušer et al . () described a L D decreasing with an increase in body aspect (side aspect angle), even for larger fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the TS-distribution pattern can help to distinguish between species of clearly different lengths. In the near future, acoustic cameras e.g., Didson will hopefully help to solve the problems in acoustic species identification (e.g., Lilja et al, 2013;Tuser et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%