The 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 2022
DOI: 10.3390/iocag2022-12214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Potential Ecological Risk Index of Toxic Metals Contamination in the Soils

Abstract: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was designed to ascertain the concentrations of heavy toxic metals (e.g., As, Sr, Mn, and Fe) and light metals (e.g., Ca, Mg, Na, and K) contamination in recreational and agricultural surface soil of Cerrito Blanco area in Matehuala municipality, San Luis Potosi, Mexico and to explore the factors that affect the spatial distribution and source identifications. The previous studies done in this particular region established Cd, Cu, Cr, Zn, or Pb as primary contamination risk factors (19,22,65,66). Therefore, these heavy metals were not repeated for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study was designed to ascertain the concentrations of heavy toxic metals (e.g., As, Sr, Mn, and Fe) and light metals (e.g., Ca, Mg, Na, and K) contamination in recreational and agricultural surface soil of Cerrito Blanco area in Matehuala municipality, San Luis Potosi, Mexico and to explore the factors that affect the spatial distribution and source identifications. The previous studies done in this particular region established Cd, Cu, Cr, Zn, or Pb as primary contamination risk factors (19,22,65,66). Therefore, these heavy metals were not repeated for this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Despite such constraints, a significant number of samples were collected. As a standard procedure, a typical soil sample of 1 kg of fresh surface soil was collected from each sampling site and wrapped in a sealed double polyethylene bag before delivering to the testing centre (22,67). All soil sampling sites were georeferenced using a GPS tracking device called a Garmin Etrex Personal Navigator.…”
Section: Sampling Of Soil and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A proportion less than 2 mm was obtained by sieving the soil samples after they were air-dried at room temperature. According to a considerably modified version of ISO 11466:1995, surface soil samples were digested [20,21]. Next, 10 ml of aqua regia (HNO3:HCl, 3:1) was then added to a beaker containing 1.0 gm of soil sample.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of As in the soil is about 5 times higher than the permissible limit, which means that the level of As contamination in this soil is very high. The permissible limits of heavy metals in the surface soil were As (22 mg/kg) [17], Cd (0.80 mg/kg) [27], Co (40 mg/kg) [28], Cr (100 mg/kg) [27], Cu (36 mg/kg) [21], Ni (35 mg/kg) [27], and Pb (85 mg/kg) [21]. All the permissible limit values given in this study are taken as per the global standard values of different places published in previous studies.…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics Of Heavy Metals Concentrations In Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%