2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the experimental results, a biomass plant alternative was the best option. Atmaca and Basar (2012) applied Analytic Network Process (ANP) to determine the most appropriate energy resource for Turkey. They found that nuclear power was the best alternative.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the experimental results, a biomass plant alternative was the best option. Atmaca and Basar (2012) applied Analytic Network Process (ANP) to determine the most appropriate energy resource for Turkey. They found that nuclear power was the best alternative.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be handled as two subcategories: fixed and variable costs. Maintenance costs and wages of full-time employees form fixed costs, while breakdown costs and wages of part-time employees constitute variable cost (Atmaca and Basar 2012).…”
Section: Economic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collected from the technical review and experts is then fed into an MCDM model to evaluate and compare WtE technologies for India and the UK. The MCDM analysis is performed in SuperDecisions ® which is a well-established software package for carrying out MCDM studies based on mathematical decision making theories, and it has been applied by a number of researchers in other studies (Atmaca andBasar, 2012 andBanar, et al, 2007). The overall outcome from the MCDM model is a preference ranking for each technological alternative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Identification of core technologies [24]; • The appraisal and applicability of investments in different energy power plants [25]; • An assessment of the reduction in Carbon Dioxide Partnerships [26]; • Solar thermal power plant investment and project evaluation [27].…”
Section: Intensity Of Importance Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%