2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00534.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abdominal wall defects by 19 European registries

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
131
4
10

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
131
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…(7)(8)(9)12) DIAGNOSIS A gastroschisis diagnosis can be achieved in the prenatal stage by means of an ultrasonography, which has high sensitivity and specificity for its detection. Detecting the disease is possible since week 12 (19) with rates of up to 90%, depending on the quality of the equipment used, the institution were the examination is performed and the experience of the staff (19)(20)(21)(22), which would explain why, in this case, the pathology was not detected prenatally, despite the adequate number of controls and two ultrasound scans taken after week 12.…”
Section: Etiopathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7)(8)(9)12) DIAGNOSIS A gastroschisis diagnosis can be achieved in the prenatal stage by means of an ultrasonography, which has high sensitivity and specificity for its detection. Detecting the disease is possible since week 12 (19) with rates of up to 90%, depending on the quality of the equipment used, the institution were the examination is performed and the experience of the staff (19)(20)(21)(22), which would explain why, in this case, the pathology was not detected prenatally, despite the adequate number of controls and two ultrasound scans taken after week 12.…”
Section: Etiopathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imaging modality is preferred as it is non invasive, rapid and allows real time foetal examination [4]. Antenatal diagnosis allows in-utero transfer, planned delivery in a specialized unit and early counselling of the parents [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, studies addressing facial clefts 8 , isolated 9 and associated 10 heart malformations, limb reduction deficiencies 11 , neural tube defects 12 and abdominal wall defects 13 The detection rate varied widely between registries, from 62% to 97% for neural tube defects 12 from 11% to 48% for congenital heart disease 9,10 , from 0% to 64% for limb reduction deficiences 11 from 0% to 75% for cleft lip palate 8 , from 0% to 100% for omphalocele and from 18% to 100% for gastroschisis 13 , and from 38% to 72% for gastrointestinal anomalies (Hausler et al, unpublished data) despite the fact that the registries participating in this study used the same methodology. Variations in detection rate may result from differences in operator skill, equipment used, or the gestation at which examinations are performed.…”
Section: The Euroscan Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%