2016
DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20161564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of prescribing pattern and adverse effects of fixed dose combination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GI-related adverse reaction observed in 28 participants. It was found that eighty percent of the adverse reaction was possible in nature [12], which supported our study results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…GI-related adverse reaction observed in 28 participants. It was found that eighty percent of the adverse reaction was possible in nature [12], which supported our study results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Likewise a study by Gor et al had 80% of possible ADRs with the majority being mild, as the rechallenge and dechallenge may not have occurred in the patients administering the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 21 Different outcome in terms of causality assessment in the study done by Sudhakar et al showed majority of probable ADRs (85.2%); because even if it is not possible to actually perform rechallenge and dechallenge because of ethical concern, withdrawal of medicine after the occurrence of ADR and consequent decrease in ADR intensity can validate the probable causality assessment. 22 Differing in case of causality but similar in case of severity, the study done by Mukherjee et al had 83.03% probable/likely ADRs with majority ADRs being mild (83.33%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%