2018
DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iry058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Procalcitonin Accuracy for the Distinction Between Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Sepsis in Burn Patients

Abstract: Sepsis is the main cause of death in burns. Early institution of antimicrobial therapy is crucial to optimize outcomes but superfluous therapy increases adverse events, microbial resistance, and costs. Blood cultures are the gold standard for diagnosis but can take 48 to 72 hours. Biomarkers are used to help sepsis diagnosis and distinction between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cause. The aim of this work is to evaluate procalcitonin (PCT) accuracy for this distinction in burn patients. Retrospecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, use of a PCT assay may be helpful in controlling bacterial infection secondary to the pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, several studies have shown that PCT can be used to distinguish Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria and fungal bloodstream infections [18–20] . This would allow the choice of antimicrobial agents empirically when microbiological results are not available, despite the lack of desirable precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, use of a PCT assay may be helpful in controlling bacterial infection secondary to the pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, several studies have shown that PCT can be used to distinguish Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria and fungal bloodstream infections [18–20] . This would allow the choice of antimicrobial agents empirically when microbiological results are not available, despite the lack of desirable precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several studies have shown that PCT can be used to distinguish Gram-negative from Gram-positive bacteria and fungal bloodstream infections. [18][19][20] This would allow the choice of antimicrobial agents empirically when microbiological results are not available, despite the lack of desirable precision. It may be taken as an additive diagnostic value of PCT when used for the evaluation of patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, it was observed that RDW significantly increased in preterm infants with LOGNS and that an RDW value of >19.50% was a significant marker in predicting LOGNS. It is of utmost importance to initiate timely antimicrobial therapy during a sepsis episode and prevent an unnecessary exposure of broad‐spectrum antibiotics to the patient . We speculate that the increased inflammatory response owing to Gram‐negative sepsis results in dysregulation of erythropoiesis, which in turn leads to increase in the RDW levels; these increased levels might help the clinician in selecting an empiric antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our study, PCT in the CPSS group was significantly higher than that in the CNSS group. Several studies have indicated that PCT levels are significantly higher in adult patients with gram-negative sepsis than in adult patients with gram-positive sepsis ( 25 28 ). However, in this study, subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in PCT levels between gram-positive and gram-negative septic shock in children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%