2014
DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912014004006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of prognostic factors of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury

Abstract: among the factors studied, only the presence of mydriasis with absence of pupillary reflex, scoring 4 and 5 in the Glasgow Coma Scale, association of intracranial lesions and diversion of midline structures (DML) exceeding 15 mm correlated statistically as predictors of poor prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
2
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
9
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of Glasgow Coma Scale in relation to the clinical progression was also performed and is encouraged in the clinical practice for optimal evaluation of patients with CET. Confirming the literature, the present study observed that the more severe the CET the higher the probability of progressing to death (Saade et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The analysis of Glasgow Coma Scale in relation to the clinical progression was also performed and is encouraged in the clinical practice for optimal evaluation of patients with CET. Confirming the literature, the present study observed that the more severe the CET the higher the probability of progressing to death (Saade et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our report alcohol did not influence the outcome of our patients but we did not consider its blood level. Absence of pupillary reflex has been repeatedly reported as a negative prognostic factor (9,19). Possibly because of a limi ted number of patients with non-reactive pupils and the fact that uni-or bilaterality of this was not taken into account we did not observed similar result in our group of patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Их изложение целесообразно начать с наи-более тревожных механизмов развития мидри-аза -парасимпатических стволовых рас-стройств с поражением ядерного комплекса и/или внутримозговой части глазодвигатель-ного нерва, обусловленных локальными нару-шениями гемодинамики в верхнемедиальных отделах ствола [13,17] или (что встречается го-раздо чаще) его диффузной ишемией, метаболи-ческой энцефалопатией, черепно-мозговой трав-мой, аневризмой церебральных сосудов, остро возникшим масс-эффектом (кровоизлиянием), опухолью, височно-тенториальным вклинением [22,34,38,40,48,62,79]. В таких ситуациях мидриаз указывает на сторону поражения, сви-детельствует об ургентности ситуации и всегда сочетается с другой неврологической сим-птоматикой!…”
Section: Discussionunclassified