Evaluation of Project Smart Goals Achievement Using Analytic Network Process

Abstract

Although every problem has multiple solutions, many restrictions and various ways to be addressed, there are also many techniques, methods and approaches proposed by scholars and practitioners that can be implemented to help increase our decision making effectiveness. The Forum will address this issue by engaging participants to reach a group decision using a proprietary web based platform that implements the Group Analytic Network Process (GANP), named WEB ANP SOLVER that is open for academic use. An illustrative case concerning the selection of the best candidate for a job position as a teaching associate based on given profiles and preselected criteria will be used during the Forum. The results of this game will provide significant insights for the group decision making process, explore the proposed techniques and bring out the advantages and disadvantages reported in literature.

De-normalizing corruption in the Indonesian public sector through behavioral re-engineering

“…According to Smith, Australian public institutions have an administrative culture that values the importance of data management which enables various evaluations regarding their performance to be carried out more accurately (Smith, 2015). Just as with other projects, corruption eradication must be conducted in a specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and timely (SMART) way (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013). “Specific” means there is a clear goal for every corruption eradication initiative (Prabowo, 2013).…”

“…“Specific” means there is a clear goal for every corruption eradication initiative (Prabowo, 2013). The initiatives must also be “measurable” so that we know whether or not the predetermined objectives have been achieved (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013). With regard to the existing resources and limitations, each program must be formulated with a goal that is “attainable” to those who will execute it (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013).…”

“…The initiatives must also be “measurable” so that we know whether or not the predetermined objectives have been achieved (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013). With regard to the existing resources and limitations, each program must be formulated with a goal that is “attainable” to those who will execute it (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013). “Relevant” means each anti-corruption initiative is related or connected to the current situation or problems so that it will not end up as a waste of resources.…”

“…“Relevant” means each anti-corruption initiative is related or connected to the current situation or problems so that it will not end up as a waste of resources. Finally, there should be a clear “timeline” for the achievement of every anti-corruption objective (Whited, 2008; Subrt and Brozova, 2012; Prabowo, 2013).…”