Evaluation of proliferation and apoptosis markers in circulating tumor cells of women with early breast cancer who are candidates for tumor dormancy

Abstract

IntroductionClinical dormancy is frequently observed in breast cancer. In the present study, we aimed to characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in dormancy candidates (DC) with early breast cancer in terms of proliferation and apoptosis.MethodsCytospins of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from DC (n = 122) who were disease-free for at least 5 years and from metastatic patients (n = 40) who relapsed more than 5 years after surgery. Sequential samples from eight DC (n = 36) who maintained a prolonged disease-free status and from eight DC (n = 27) presenting late relapse during follow-up, were also analyzed. PBMCs were triple stained with a pancytokeratin, antibody along with anti-Ki67 and anti-M30 antibodies as proliferation and apoptosis markers, respectively.ResultsCTCs were identified in 40 (33%) of 122 DC and in 15 (37.5%) of 40 metastatic patients. In total, twenty-five (62.5%) DC had exclusively dormant (Ki67(-)/M30(-)), seven (17.5%) had proliferative Ki67(+)/M30(-), four (10%) had apoptotic Ki67(-)/M30(+) and four (10%) had both phenotypes of proliferative and apoptotic CTCs. In comparison, 53.4% of CTC-positive metastatic patients had exclusively dormant and 46.6% had proliferative CTCs; none had apoptotic CTCs (P = 0.039). Among all CTCs detected in DC patients, 82.4% were dormant, whereas in the nondormant population, 32.5% were proliferative and 67.5% apoptotic. The respective percentages in metastatic patients were 59.1%, 100% and 0% (P <0.0001). Moreover, apoptotic CTCs prevailed among nondormant CTCs detected in sequential samples from DC who remained in a prolonged disease-free status compared to those presenting late relapse during follow-up (70.6% versus 43.5% (P = 0.0002)).ConclusionsThe apoptotic index of CTCs is increased during clinical dormancy, whereas the proliferation index is increased on relapse. In addition, apoptotic CTCs are more frequently encountered during follow-up in DC patients who remain disease-free compared to those with subsequent late relapse, suggesting that monitoring proliferation and apoptosis in CTCs during clinical dormancy merits further investigation as a tool for predicting late disease recurrence.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-014-0485-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aurora kinase A revives dormant laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells via FAK/PI3K/Akt pathway activation

“…The dormancy-related P130 and E2F4 proteins are abundant in quiescent cells [37, 38], the E2F4-P130 complex is unique in quiescent cells [21, 39–42], and the P107 and Ki67 proteins are rare [43]. E2F4, an E2F transcription factor, mediates the expression of cell cycle proteins [44].…”

Epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity and circulating tumor cells: Travel companions to metastases

“…Accordingly, several works identified a large number of apoptotic CTCs in cancer patients (Larson et al, 2004;Rossi et al, 2010) and, in some studies, a low percentage of apoptotic CTCs has been associated with poorer clinical parameters (Kallergi et al, 2013;Spiliotaki et al, 2014). Accordingly, several works identified a large number of apoptotic CTCs in cancer patients (Larson et al, 2004;Rossi et al, 2010) and, in some studies, a low percentage of apoptotic CTCs has been associated with poorer clinical parameters (Kallergi et al, 2013;Spiliotaki et al, 2014).…”

Abduction Based Drug Target Discovery Using Boolean Control Network

“…The pair (CYCLIN D1, BAX) distinguishes four phenotypes: apoptosis, division, quiescence (apoptosis balanced by division) and dormancy (neither apoptosis nor division) [43] through to the following signatures: (0, 1) for apoptosis, (1, 0) for division, (0, 0) for quiescence and (1, 1) for dormancy.…”