2010
DOI: 10.2174/092986610789909412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Protein Phosphorylation Site Predictors

Abstract: A series of elegant phosphorylation site prediction methods have been developed, which are playing an increasingly important role in accelerating the experimental characterization of phosphorylation sites in phosphoproteins. In this study, we selected six recently published methods (DISPHOS, NetPhosK, PPSP, KinasePhos, Scansite and PredPhospho) to evaluate their performance. First, we compiled three testing datasets containing experimentally verified phosphorylation sites for mammalian, Arabidopsis and rice pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of consensus sites to predict kinase phosphorylation sites is sometimes useful, but often inaccurate (Que et al, 2010). Here we provide evidence for CPKs that predictions are usually wrong when based on consensus sites alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of consensus sites to predict kinase phosphorylation sites is sometimes useful, but often inaccurate (Que et al, 2010). Here we provide evidence for CPKs that predictions are usually wrong when based on consensus sites alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 100 μM Hg/pervanadate experiment, 226 of 943 (24%) had motif assignments (figure 3 B and 4 B). Scansite has high specificity and low sensitivity relative to other phosphosite prediction algorithms and assignment of kinase motifs for less than 50% of the submitted sites is reasonable 42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2011). PTM predictors have been discussed and evaluated (Eisenhaber and Eisenhaber, 2010; Que et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Question 7: What Posttranslational Modifications Have Been Rmentioning
confidence: 99%