2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c03706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Proton-Induced DNA Damage in 3D-Engineered Glioblastoma Microenvironments

Abstract: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating cancer of the brain with an extremely poor prognosis. For this reason, besides clinical and preclinical studies, novel in vitro models for the assessment of cancer response to drugs and radiation are being developed. In such context, three-dimensional (3D)engineered cellular microenvironments, compared to unrealistic two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture, provide a model closer to the in vivo configuration. Concerning cancer treatment, while X-ray radiotherapy and chem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant limitation of 2PP is the relatively long printing time hindering the upscaling of the technology ( Moroni et al, 2018 ). Multiple polymeric, hydrogel or composite materials were employed in combination with 2PP to fabricate micro- and nano-patterns as well as 3D structures for in vitro cellular studies involving neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, murine cerebellar granule, chondrocytes, macrophages, neuronal and stem cells ( Marino et al, 2013 ; Accardo et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Turunen et al, 2017 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2019 ; Fendler et al, 2019 ; Babi et al, 2021 ; Bertels et al, 2021 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2021 ; Nouri-Goushki et al, 2021 ; Akolawala et al, 2022 ; Costa et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most significant limitation of 2PP is the relatively long printing time hindering the upscaling of the technology ( Moroni et al, 2018 ). Multiple polymeric, hydrogel or composite materials were employed in combination with 2PP to fabricate micro- and nano-patterns as well as 3D structures for in vitro cellular studies involving neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, murine cerebellar granule, chondrocytes, macrophages, neuronal and stem cells ( Marino et al, 2013 ; Accardo et al, 2017 , 2018 ; Turunen et al, 2017 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2019 ; Fendler et al, 2019 ; Babi et al, 2021 ; Bertels et al, 2021 ; Maciulaitis et al, 2021 ; Nouri-Goushki et al, 2021 ; Akolawala et al, 2022 ; Costa et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create such scaffolds, TPP have shown to be an ideal method of fabrication, where several size orders of magnitude can be spanned needed for the incorporation of 3D morphological hierarchy, thereby replicating the structural influence of the ECM on cells. While 3D TPP has been used to mimic ECM structures for example in the context of cell differentiation [ 30 , 31 ], and stem cell therapy [ 32 , 33 ], or to generate 3D microenvironments suited to conduct in vitro tests of medical therapies [ 34 ], here we propose the application of TPP to generate 3D metrology structures for the analysis of cell packing and cell motility. The systematically changed dimensions of wall separations and niches allow us to use the 3D polymer structures to “act as rulers“, that are able to operate on the typical dimensions of cellular sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20,24,25] Importantly, the recent development of a biocompatible and low-autofluorescent methacrylate photosensitive polymer (IP-Visio) for 2PP has facilitated the use of this approach for life science applications. [23,26,27] Here, we have studied patient-derived glioma cells cultured on biomimetic 3D-engineered IP-Visio microscaffolds, fabricated by the 2PP technique, and compared them to standard 2D control models. Our results show that a standard glioma cell line (U-87) as well as four patient-derived glioma cultures can efficiently adhere and colonize the structures.…”
Section: (2 Of 14)mentioning
confidence: 99%