Evaluation of Public R&amp;amp;D Policy: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Négassi, Syoum; Sattin, Jean‐François

doi:10.4236/ti.2019.101001

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Даже результаты метаисследований 6 часто различаются, а иногда прямо противоречат друг другу. Например, в работе S. Negassi, J. Sattin [13] на основании изучения 60 публикаций получен вывод о значимом положительном влиянии инвестиционных налоговых кредитов на расходы компаний на НИОКР. В другой метаработе на основе 34 публикаций (F. Castellacci, C. Mee Lie [14]) также было выявлено положительное влияние налоговых кредитов на проведение фирмами НИОКР, однако отмечалось, что наибольший положительный эффект на инновационную активность инвестиционные налоговые кредиты имеют в случае мелких предприятий, организаций, работающих в сфере предоставления услуг, и в странах с низким уровнем технологического развития.…”

Section: прямые субсидии более эффективны?unclassified

Do Tax Incentives for Innovation Work? Evaluation of Effectiveness in Russia and in the World

Osmolovskaya-Suslina¹,

Leukhin²

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Финансовый журнал / Financial Journal №5 2018 НАЛОГОВАЯ СИСТЕМА. СТИМУЛИРОВАНИЕ ИННОВАЦИЙ Работает ли налоговое стимулирование инноваций? Оценка эффективности в России и в мире Аннотация В данной статье на основе обзора исследований мы предприняли попытку ответить на вопросдействительно ли налоговые инструменты сами по себе являются неэффективным способом стимулирования инноваций или же существуют препятствия, мешающие эффективности таких видов поддержки. В работе проводится сравнение налогового стимулирования с прямым финансированием инновационной деятельности; показано, что каждый из этих методов стимулирования исследований и разработок обладает своими преимуществами и недостатками. Также обсуждаются причины низкой востребованности налоговых льгот в России. Кроме того, рассматриваются ключевые характеристики благоприятной среды для инновационной активности. На основе проведенного анализа мы приходим к мнению, что от налоговых льгот не стоит отказываться, а также предлагаем возможные способы совершенствования налогового стимулирования в России: анализ эффективности льгот на уровне федеральных органов, введение инструмента «патентного окна», создание условий стимулирования инноваций физическими лицами и др. Ключевые слова: налоги, льготы, стимулирование инноваций, государственная поддержка инноваций, эффективность налоговых стимулов JEL: H2, H3, K34 А. Л. Суслина, Р. С. Леухин Александра Леонидовна Суслина (e-mail: asuslina@eeg.ru), руководитель направления «Фискальная политика» Экономической экспертной группы; младший научный сотрудник Центра бюджетного анализа и прогнозирования Научно-исследовательского финансового института (г. Москва) Роман Сергеевич Леухин

show abstract

Section: прямые субсидии более эффективны?unclassified

Do Tax Incentives for Innovation Work? Evaluation of Effectiveness in Russia and in the World

Osmolovskaya-Suslina¹,

Leukhin²

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Technological innovation drives firm competitiveness and sustains the growth of an economy (Danguy, 2016;Mai et al, 2019;Yeo, 2019). In the United States (US) and European countries, a primary concern for long-term economic development is the nationwide technical performance (Negassi & Sattin, 2019;Tomasz & Arkadiusz, 2019). In recent years, China has gained a reputation of being the 'world's factory', and has aspired to improve its innovation capacity from 'made in China' to 'created in China'.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation policy and firm patent value: evidence from China

Cheng

Qiu

et al. 2021

Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to contribute to the empirical literature that evaluates the impact of the Science & Technology (S&T) Outline, a Chinese innovation policy implemented in 2006, measured by the scale of patent value. We first create a comprehensive patent valuation model (CPVM), derived from the extended patent renewal model and a variety of feature indices, to measure a firm's patent value. From a database with over 700,000 Chinese patents from 1985 to 2013, we find that the patent value increases after the release of the S&T Outline, and the scale of patent value after 2006 is about 26.52 times more than that before 2006. Further, we use a quasi-difference in differences (DID) model to estimate the growth effect caused by the innovation policy. The results indicate that the S&T Outline had a significant effect on the promotion of patent value, in industries with high patent intensity. Considering the lag effect of the S&T Outline, we construct innovation correlation networks to visualise and compare its promotion effect. We find that regional networks have a gathering tendency after policy implementation, while industrial networks have a decentralising tendency.

show abstract

Can Direct Subsidies or Tax Incentives Improve the R&D Efficiency of the Manufacturing Industry in China?

Liu

Zhou

2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The understanding of the impact of different government support methods on R&D efficiency is of great significance for evaluating the performance of innovation policies in various countries. We selected 31 manufacturing industries in China from 2009 to 2015, used the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) method to measure R&D efficiency, and used tobit regression method to examine the relationship between direct government subsidies and preferential tax policies and manufacturing R&D efficiency. The results reveal that the overall R&D efficiency of China’s manufacturing industry was low, but it has been steadily increasing, and the R&D efficiency of emerging industries was significantly higher than that of traditional industries. Tax incentives played a stable and significant role in promoting R&D efficiency in manufacturing. Affected by factors such as the government’s long-term preference and information asymmetry, direct subsidies had no significant impact on the current R&D efficiency of the manufacturing industry, and began to play a positive role after a two-year lag. Based on the above research findings, this paper suggests that progressive preferential tax rates can be designed according to the “base + increment” approach for tax preferential policies. At the same time, different proportions of tax cuts should be set for enterprises of different sizes and levels of innovation, and the focus should be on small and medium-sized enterprises and emerging industries. In terms of direct funding subsidies, the government should not only increase the support for basic research, but also give more preference to enterprises that receive tax incentives for research and development, so as to enhance the complementary effect of the two types of subsidy policies. The marginal contribution of this paper mainly includes three aspects: First, based on the Chinese situation, the impact of direct government subsidies and tax incentives on the R&D efficiency of the manufacturing industry is tested. Second, we present the evidence that direct government funding subsidies “crowd out” enterprise R&D funds. Thirdly, we describe the influence of enterprise scale, innovation level, ownership, and management ability on R&D efficiency of the manufacturing industry, and put forward the possible influence mechanism.

show abstract

Evaluation of Public R&D Policy: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 27 publications

Do Tax Incentives for Innovation Work? Evaluation of Effectiveness in Russia and in the World

Do Tax Incentives for Innovation Work? Evaluation of Effectiveness in Russia and in the World

Innovation policy and firm patent value: evidence from China

Can Direct Subsidies or Tax Incentives Improve the R&D Efficiency of the Manufacturing Industry in China?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About