2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12633-021-00999-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Pulverized Cow Bone Ash and Waste Glass Powder on the Geotechnical Properties of Tropical Laterite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blayi, et al (2020) used different WG contents of 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25 % in soils and found that the increase in the WG content from 0% to 25% led to a decrease in the OMC from 18.5% to 13% and an increase in the MDD from 1.74 g/cm3 to 1.94 g/cm3, which are equivalent to nearly 30% reduction in the OMC and more than 9% increase in the MDD when the WG content increased from 0% to 25%. Adetayo, et al (2021) conducted field tests with two test pits (Pits A and B) at different depths (1.5 m and 1.25 m, respectively) to evaluate the effect of WG and Cow Bone Ash and found that the MDD of the treated soil in Pit A was increased by 8.8% (from 1.7 to 1.85 g/cm3) by adding 4% WG and Cow Bone Ash. However, a further increase in the WG and Cow Bone Ash content (e.g., 8%) in the soil reduced the MDD from 1.85 to 1.76 g/cm3 (the same result obtained by [Kumar, et al, 2020]).…”
Section: Mdd and Omcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blayi, et al (2020) used different WG contents of 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25 % in soils and found that the increase in the WG content from 0% to 25% led to a decrease in the OMC from 18.5% to 13% and an increase in the MDD from 1.74 g/cm3 to 1.94 g/cm3, which are equivalent to nearly 30% reduction in the OMC and more than 9% increase in the MDD when the WG content increased from 0% to 25%. Adetayo, et al (2021) conducted field tests with two test pits (Pits A and B) at different depths (1.5 m and 1.25 m, respectively) to evaluate the effect of WG and Cow Bone Ash and found that the MDD of the treated soil in Pit A was increased by 8.8% (from 1.7 to 1.85 g/cm3) by adding 4% WG and Cow Bone Ash. However, a further increase in the WG and Cow Bone Ash content (e.g., 8%) in the soil reduced the MDD from 1.85 to 1.76 g/cm3 (the same result obtained by [Kumar, et al, 2020]).…”
Section: Mdd and Omcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBR is an essential geotechnical engineering parameter for evaluating subgrade and base course strengths and stiffness for pavement design including the determination of pavement thicknesses (Adetayo, et al, 2021;Siyab Khan, Tufail and Mateeullah, 2018). The typical range for CBR value of a subgrade layer is in the range of 2% to 12% [59].…”
Section: Cbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cow bone ash, is an inorganic material gotten from cow bones, dried outside at an average temperature of 30 °C for 48 h and burnt at an extremely high temperature ranging between 900 to 915 °C in a furnace or consuming in the air and grounded to fine powder utilizing processing machine [41]. In this manner, Trends Sci.…”
Section: Cow Bone Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the amendment of soil with non-conventional ameliorants which are sustainable and economical, has proved to be very successful due to their ability to perform anticipated outcomes in the geotechnical parameters of soft clay soil compared to conventional ameliorants. Thus, the emerging advances in construction materials have proved that diverse ameliorants rich in alumina and silica such as sawdust ash—quarry dust 5 , cement kiln dust—rice husk ash 6 , cement kiln dust—metakaolin 7 , 8 , cement kiln dust 9 , periwinkle shell ash 10 , oyster shell ash 11 , 12 , quarry dust 13 , marble dust—rice husk ash 14 , coconut husk ash 15 , corncob ash 16 , locust bean waste ash 17 , 18 , groundnut shell ash 19 – 21 , lime-rice husk ash 22 , bambara nut shell ash 23 , yam peel ash 24 , metakaolin 25 , mine tailings 26 , palm bunch ash 27 , cement kiln dust-periwinkle shell ash 28 , 29 , cow bone ash—waste glass powder 30 , sawdust ash—lime 31 , rice husk ash—sisal fibre 32 , coffee husk ash 33 , construction waste 34 , sawdust 35 , nanosilica 36 , electric arc furnace dust 37 , iron ore tailing 38 and so on have been utilised in the amendment studies of deficient soils and concrete structures. Conclusively, as a result of the positive outcomes recorded by the incorporation of solid wastes in soil amelioration studies, a comprehensive review was carried out on the trends in expansive soil stabilization using calcium-based stabilizer materials 39 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%