1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00248-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of QT interval duration and dispersion and proposed clinical criteria in diagnosis of long QT syndrome in patients with a genetically uniform type of LQT1

Abstract: Not all LQT1 patients can be distinguished from healthy relatives by assessment of QT duration or clinical criteria. Presence of LQT1 gene can carry the risk of cardiac events even with no or only marginal prolongation of QT interval.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Follow-up testing demonstrated normal left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction Ն50%) and normal coronary arteries. Patients were excluded if they had a resting corrected QT interval (QTc) Ͼ460 ms (for men) or a QTc Ͼ480 ms (for women) 20,21 or if a reversible cause of cardiac arrest such as marked hypokalemia or drug overdose was present. Investigators and coordinators performed a consultation/assessment whenever possible to determine whether reversible causes, including drug overdose or a proarrhythmic effect, were present, or they reviewed the medical record when the arrest was no longer acute.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up testing demonstrated normal left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction Ն50%) and normal coronary arteries. Patients were excluded if they had a resting corrected QT interval (QTc) Ͼ460 ms (for men) or a QTc Ͼ480 ms (for women) 20,21 or if a reversible cause of cardiac arrest such as marked hypokalemia or drug overdose was present. Investigators and coordinators performed a consultation/assessment whenever possible to determine whether reversible causes, including drug overdose or a proarrhythmic effect, were present, or they reviewed the medical record when the arrest was no longer acute.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 2 facts appear difficult to reconcile with one another, although it is known that penetrance (ie, the number of individuals having a particular genotype relative to those displaying the associated clinical phenotype) is rather low 31,32 in families with documented LQT1 mutations, histories of seizures, and sudden cardiac death. A far too simplistic explanation would be that individuals with mutated I Ks channel proteins and elevated sympathetic tone lack the ability to compensate and limit excessive APD lengthening as a result of other causes such as extreme bradycardia, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, changes in autonomic neural influences, or exposure to drugs affecting other repolarizing currents (eg, I Na,slow , I Cl , I to , I Kr , I K1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-up testing demonstrated normal left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction Ն50%) and normal coronary arteries. Patients were excluded when males had a resting corrected QT (QTc) Ͼ460 ms and females with a QTc Ͼ480 ms 22,23 or when a reversible cause of cardiac arrest, such as marked hypokalemia or drug overdose, was present. No patient or family member had a QTc Ͻ350 ms.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%