2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of quantitative assays for the identification of direct signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 In commonly used STAT3 inhibition assays, (including the fluorescence polarization (FP) assay, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and ELISAs), reactive compounds that chemically modify STAT3 to impair its stability or binding interactions would induce the same response as potent but non-reactive STAT3 inhibitors (described in Figure 1B). 12 When used in cell-based assays, these reactive compounds may non-specifically alkylate cellular components to induce toxicity. A particularly hazardous manifestation of this would be in cancer cell proliferation assays where reactive compounds (that show inhibitory activity in traditional in vitro STAT3 assays) would inhibit cancer cell proliferation and could modify cell signaling networks because of their inherent toxicity, and not necessarily because they bind selectively to STAT3 or another protein of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In commonly used STAT3 inhibition assays, (including the fluorescence polarization (FP) assay, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and ELISAs), reactive compounds that chemically modify STAT3 to impair its stability or binding interactions would induce the same response as potent but non-reactive STAT3 inhibitors (described in Figure 1B). 12 When used in cell-based assays, these reactive compounds may non-specifically alkylate cellular components to induce toxicity. A particularly hazardous manifestation of this would be in cancer cell proliferation assays where reactive compounds (that show inhibitory activity in traditional in vitro STAT3 assays) would inhibit cancer cell proliferation and could modify cell signaling networks because of their inherent toxicity, and not necessarily because they bind selectively to STAT3 or another protein of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niclosamide has been identified as a direct STAT3 inhibitor through interaction with the DNA-binding domain (37). In addition to its role in STAT3 inhibition, niclosamide has also been revealed to concurrently inhibit multiple intracellular signaling pathways, including the Wnt, Notch 1, mTOR and NF-κB signaling cascades (10,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular mechanisms underlying the antineoplastic effect of niclosamide have been explored in many human malignant cancers, indicating that niclosamide exhibits anticancer activity by suppressing many oncogenic signaling pathways concurrently (7,13,17,23,27,28,30,36). For instance, niclosamide has been identified as a direct inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) through interaction with the DNA-binding domain (37). In ovarian cancer, niclosamide significantly decreased the expression of proteins in the wingless/integrated (Wnt), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and STAT3 pathways and caused significant inhibition of proliferation of cells (28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…inhibitors have been considered as novel modes of cancer therapy (18,19). For thousands of years, a well-known Chinese plant, Salvia miltiorrhiza (Danshen), has been used to treat cardiovascular (20), gastrointestinal (21), circulatory (22) and neurological (22) diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although STAT3 proteins are known to be ubiquitous in cells and found in the cytoplasm and mitochondrion, it is not known how the expression of STAT3 in different cancer cells can influence CT anticancer activity(11,16).STAT3 signaling activation stimulates transcription of different oncogenes that will perpetuate cell proliferation, cell survival and resistance to apoptosis(56). Therefore, CT ability to bind to STAT3 proteins will impede STAT3 phosphorylation and subsequently STAT3 signaling activation(19). Data obtained from this in vitro study using alive-cell imaging-based assay showed that CT at 20 M concentration was able to induce cell death in various human and canine cancer cell lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%